 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Router for Hughes Satelite System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/router-for-hughes-satelite-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/router-for-hughes-satelite-system/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 03:14:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: bobkberg</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/router-for-hughes-satelite-system/#comment-53800</link>
		<dc:creator>bobkberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-53800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MrDenny is quite correct, however there may be other factors.  You did not mention what you use these various PCs for.  If they&#039;re all used just for casual web browsing and such, then his answer stands as is.

If you are using any ot them for serious gaming, then you may need to look at boxes (from the same set of manufacturers) that are optimized for gaming.

If any of them is being used as a file server with heavy I/O (reading and writing of files) you may want to consider gigabit ethernet.  Since they are all media center types, you need to also consider if they are transferring streaming content among themselves.

I realize that this doesn&#039;t answer your question as much as it asks you for more information - but if you want the best performance for the money, you have to be specific about what sort of &quot;performances&quot; you&#039;re specifically going to be running.

Bob]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MrDenny is quite correct, however there may be other factors.  You did not mention what you use these various PCs for.  If they&#8217;re all used just for casual web browsing and such, then his answer stands as is.</p>
<p>If you are using any ot them for serious gaming, then you may need to look at boxes (from the same set of manufacturers) that are optimized for gaming.</p>
<p>If any of them is being used as a file server with heavy I/O (reading and writing of files) you may want to consider gigabit ethernet.  Since they are all media center types, you need to also consider if they are transferring streaming content among themselves.</p>
<p>I realize that this doesn&#8217;t answer your question as much as it asks you for more information &#8211; but if you want the best performance for the money, you have to be specific about what sort of &#8220;performances&#8221; you&#8217;re specifically going to be running.</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.012 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 268/271 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-19 20:14:37 -->