<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Question on LoadAll Subfile.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/question-on-loadall-subfile/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/question-on-loadall-subfile/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 23:43:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: bigkat</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/question-on-loadall-subfile/#comment-52014</link>
		<dc:creator>bigkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 14:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-52014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, that&#039;s right, the RPG limitations (on things like arrays and such) have been extended to 16 million-something, but this would still be a display processing limitation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, that&#8217;s right, the RPG limitations (on things like arrays and such) have been extended to 16 million-something, but this would still be a display processing limitation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sloopy</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/question-on-loadall-subfile/#comment-51967</link>
		<dc:creator>sloopy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-51967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have to ask, why would anyone want to load 9,999 records into a subfile? That&#039;s 500 screen pages.

Apart from the time taken to load, what user is going to page through 500 pages on-screen?

I have been asked about this limit many times, and always there is no good reason for loading so many records at once. Usually, it&#039;s a lack of understanding of the varieties of subfile processing, but sometimes it&#039;s because the programmer wants to hold the complete database file in the subfile. Again - there is no good reason to do that.

Consider allowing the user to filter the database into the subfile by allowing her to enter selection criteria. The selection can be done by embedded SQL or by compare-and-ITER code. This, in combination with a self-extending subfile, will cut down the number of records selected to a manageable figure. Additionally, don&#039;t load the subfile immediately on program entry, even if you are loading page by page, but instead allow the user to enter any filter values and then load after ENTER is pressed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to ask, why would anyone want to load 9,999 records into a subfile? That&#8217;s 500 screen pages.</p>
<p>Apart from the time taken to load, what user is going to page through 500 pages on-screen?</p>
<p>I have been asked about this limit many times, and always there is no good reason for loading so many records at once. Usually, it&#8217;s a lack of understanding of the varieties of subfile processing, but sometimes it&#8217;s because the programmer wants to hold the complete database file in the subfile. Again &#8211; there is no good reason to do that.</p>
<p>Consider allowing the user to filter the database into the subfile by allowing her to enter selection criteria. The selection can be done by embedded SQL or by compare-and-ITER code. This, in combination with a self-extending subfile, will cut down the number of records selected to a manageable figure. Additionally, don&#8217;t load the subfile immediately on program entry, even if you are loading page by page, but instead allow the user to enter any filter values and then load after ENTER is pressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bvining</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/question-on-loadall-subfile/#comment-51959</link>
		<dc:creator>bvining</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-51959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The maximum in V6R1 remains at 9999 and I really doubt we will ever see that number increase.  Page at a time processing is clearly the way to go when working with anything approaching this number of entries.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The maximum in V6R1 remains at 9999 and I really doubt we will ever see that number increase.  Page at a time processing is clearly the way to go when working with anything approaching this number of entries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bigkat</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/question-on-loadall-subfile/#comment-51946</link>
		<dc:creator>bigkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-51946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I believe I heard that V6R1 removes the 9999 limitation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe I heard that V6R1 removes the 9999 limitation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.037 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 309/315 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-06-19 00:01:44 -->