Comments on: Pointer not set for location referenced http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/pointer-not-set-for-location-referenced/ Sat, 25 May 2013 17:28:03 +0000 hourly 1 By: tomliotta http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/pointer-not-set-for-location-referenced/#comment-80236 tomliotta Thu, 12 Aug 2010 07:15:04 +0000 #comment-80236 It’s possible that the binding of the C module could be involved, if a procedure in that module has been called before statement 361 in the COBOL module was reached. But without seeing the COBOL CALL statement, the definition of COBOL variables involved in the call and the C prototype that was called, there’s no way for us to tell.

In any case, the reported error is involved with one of the files used by the COBOL module. The C module could be involved if there was a parameter mismatch and thereby the call into C resulted in corruption of the file interface.

Show some code so we can guess.

Tom

]]>