 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OVRDBF without any parameters specified</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/ovrdbf-without-any-parameters-specified/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/ovrdbf-without-any-parameters-specified/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:45:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: tomliotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/ovrdbf-without-any-parameters-specified/#comment-92727</link>
		<dc:creator>tomliotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 18:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-92727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m not aware of an impact in normal operations.

Potential impacts do exist, though.

First, a later DLTOVR might fail if this is removed. Ensure that no DLTOVRs reference this OVRDBF.

Second, if parameter defaults have been modified or if a duplicate of the *CMD object exists with different parameters, then there might be overriden values that affect program execution. Make sure that neither of those conditions exist.

Third, programming later in the job might look for an override for ZFT00981 and cause different logic paths depending on existence or non-existence.

There might be other possibilities. Those are what come to mind immediately. None of them seem very likely, especially if there are no comments that indicate something unusual is being done.

Regardless, be prepared for &lt;i&gt;possible side-effects&lt;/i&gt;.

Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not aware of an impact in normal operations.</p>
<p>Potential impacts do exist, though.</p>
<p>First, a later DLTOVR might fail if this is removed. Ensure that no DLTOVRs reference this OVRDBF.</p>
<p>Second, if parameter defaults have been modified or if a duplicate of the *CMD object exists with different parameters, then there might be overriden values that affect program execution. Make sure that neither of those conditions exist.</p>
<p>Third, programming later in the job might look for an override for ZFT00981 and cause different logic paths depending on existence or non-existence.</p>
<p>There might be other possibilities. Those are what come to mind immediately. None of them seem very likely, especially if there are no comments that indicate something unusual is being done.</p>
<p>Regardless, be prepared for <i>possible side-effects</i>.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/8 queries in 0.039 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 269/270 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-19 01:38:04 -->