<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opinion on rugged laptops for the enterprise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/opinion-on-rugged-laptops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/opinion-on-rugged-laptops/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:35:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: icecubbe</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/opinion-on-rugged-laptops/#comment-91191</link>
		<dc:creator>icecubbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 06:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-91191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As mentioned by Pjb0222, i am in the mining industry and as far as tests done the Panasonic is on top of the game when it gets to toughbooks, they are rugged and DON&#039;T break!I would only suggest them to you!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As mentioned by Pjb0222, i am in the mining industry and as far as tests done the Panasonic is on top of the game when it gets to toughbooks, they are rugged and DON&#8217;T break!I would only suggest them to you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjb0222</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/opinion-on-rugged-laptops/#comment-91152</link>
		<dc:creator>pjb0222</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-91152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Panasonic line is hard to beat for its nitch.  It all depends on how rugged and your other requirements.  I am sure that price is king and you are looking to cut back costs.

I just spec&#039;d out a Motion Computing slate Tablet PC (F5v) for the refigeration techs.  They needed a ruggedized device that can operate in sub-freezing and above 100 degrees.  Not cheap, but meets the needs.

For others I have used the Panasonic for full rugged and Dell&#039;s (or other&#039;s) semi-ruggedized.

One thing I insist on in ruggedized specifications on all new systems is a solid state drive.  That is one less major failure point.

The biggest questions you should look at are:
- Will a less rugedized device meet the service levels for the field techs? 
   (This is a big yes / no one.)
- How rough are your field users on the equipment?
- What was the failure rate you experienced?
- How did your failure rate compare to other users of that device in your usage scenario?
- How did your failure rate compare to industry averages for that tye of device?
- Did you purchase and use a &#039;no-fault&#039; type warrentee?
- How much down time is acceptable?
  (I know, everyone wants zero.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Panasonic line is hard to beat for its nitch.  It all depends on how rugged and your other requirements.  I am sure that price is king and you are looking to cut back costs.</p>
<p>I just spec&#8217;d out a Motion Computing slate Tablet PC (F5v) for the refigeration techs.  They needed a ruggedized device that can operate in sub-freezing and above 100 degrees.  Not cheap, but meets the needs.</p>
<p>For others I have used the Panasonic for full rugged and Dell&#8217;s (or other&#8217;s) semi-ruggedized.</p>
<p>One thing I insist on in ruggedized specifications on all new systems is a solid state drive.  That is one less major failure point.</p>
<p>The biggest questions you should look at are:<br />
- Will a less rugedized device meet the service levels for the field techs?<br />
   (This is a big yes / no one.)<br />
- How rough are your field users on the equipment?<br />
- What was the failure rate you experienced?<br />
- How did your failure rate compare to other users of that device in your usage scenario?<br />
- How did your failure rate compare to industry averages for that tye of device?<br />
- Did you purchase and use a &#8216;no-fault&#8217; type warrentee?<br />
- How much down time is acceptable?<br />
  (I know, everyone wants zero.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rechil</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/opinion-on-rugged-laptops/#comment-91135</link>
		<dc:creator>rechil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-91135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for ur quick reply. But before buy / use must clear all queries in all respect regarding this issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for ur quick reply. But before buy / use must clear all queries in all respect regarding this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swinehart6803</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/opinion-on-rugged-laptops/#comment-91133</link>
		<dc:creator>swinehart6803</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-91133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the input. We were looking at those models.
the powers that be will decide, but I would like to use Dell also.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the input. We were looking at those models.<br />
the powers that be will decide, but I would like to use Dell also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.081 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 309/315 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-06-19 13:01:12 -->