16,755 pts.
 One or multiple service providers for the WAN?
Do you use one or more service providers to provide connectivity to your WAN? Is it worth the extra cost to have redundancy from multiple partners, or is this just throwing money down the drain?

Software/Hardware used:
ASKED: October 28, 2009  6:54 PM
UPDATED: February 27, 2013  7:08 PM

Answer Wiki:
Our office has a single provider, however they have multiple upstream providers. With this we got an easy setup on our side (our provider is in the same building as us, so they simply ran a Cat5 cable to our office) but we get the benefit of having multiple providers so if one has a problem (which has happened) we are back up within a minute or two. I would say that if having the WAN go down would impact business then having multiple providers is worth it. Especially if you can leverage them both at the same time. If having the WAN go down for an hour isn't a big deal to the business then it is probably a waste of money. Well we have different providers and that too we are using two different techonlogies for establing the WAN connectivity. We are using Frame Relay from one our Service provider and from other we are usingWi-max and VSAT. Since we are into health care business we need this kind of connectivity, ================================= I have found that the "last mile" is the most trouble-prone part of the WAN. I have rarely had outages within the provider's "cloud". So, if you can get some type of redundancy in the local links, then you will address a major failure point and provide high availability to your WAN services. In the IT trenches? So am I - read my <a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/it-trenches">IT-Trenches blog</a>
Last Wiki Answer Submitted:  February 27, 2013  7:08 pm  by  Michael Tidmarsh   11,390 pts.
All Answer Wiki Contributors:  Michael Tidmarsh   11,390 pts. , Yasir Irfan   5,395 pts. , Denny Cherry   64,520 pts.
To see all answers submitted to the Answer Wiki: View Answer History.


Discuss This Question:
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _