Comments on: Reasons for using RIP instead of OSPF,EIGRP

By: chiesa

chiesa — Fri, 06 May 2011 02:29:08 +0000

i think that ,RIP is so easier than OSPF & EIGRP. The parameter in RIP is less than theirs.but if u want to use RIP in ur company,u must know the network envirement.

By: yans112112

yans112112 — Thu, 17 Mar 2011 02:15:24 +0000

Now only I”ve got one doubt.i.e We are using wired routers in our real exp mostly.Any other like wireless routers also available not small series one,i am asking about medium/large series.Suppose we have means what is the difference among wired and wireless.

By: yans112112

yans112112 — Wed, 16 Mar 2011 02:04:26 +0000

Really very thanks for your help guys.Any one has any idea about PORT FACTORS in OSPF.

By: saturno

saturno — Tue, 15 Mar 2011 17:07:46 +0000

EIGRP and OSPF are both more powerfull routing protocols than RIP.

EIGRP is proprietary (from Cisco) and is not able to escalate so well as OSPF.

OSPF is a *Senior* routing protocol, vendor independent and relay on open standards. When well designed and implemented (need a real PRO to do it well) can give you all the manageability wanted/needed.

By: yans112112

yans112112 — Tue, 15 Mar 2011 04:55:56 +0000

Thanks,and one more thing.how can we edit means in the what sense are you saying.Sorry,actually i don’t have very depth knowledge.Can you please explain.we have areas in OSPF means we cant edit.I agree with you,then what about EIGRP.

One more question Don’ mind.Actually i am attending interviews,that’s why i am asking.Can you please,Do you have any idea about PORT FACTORS in OSPF.