 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: netstat -s for TCP Statistics for IPv4?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/netstat-s-for-tcp-statistics-for-ipv4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/netstat-s-for-tcp-statistics-for-ipv4/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 03:14:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: bbb</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/netstat-s-for-tcp-statistics-for-ipv4/#comment-69464</link>
		<dc:creator>bbb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-69464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i thinks its problem ocour, by load on your server]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i thinks its problem ocour, by load on your server</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy Tate</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/netstat-s-for-tcp-statistics-for-ipv4/#comment-68234</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy Tate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-68234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would install Microsoft Network Monitor 3.3 and capture traffic during these events. You can analyze it in Network Monitor or use Wireshark to gain additional insight into what is going on. TCP handshakes &amp; RSTs might contribute to some performance issues, but I don&#039;t think the number you mention is excessive when you consider how many packets are actually in a transaction. Are you using large pings (&gt;= 1000bytes)? See if the packet size matters on the network. Maybe there&#039;s a device with bad MTU settings. Also check duplex / speed settings along the path. These should always be hard-set for servers to switch interfaces.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would install Microsoft Network Monitor 3.3 and capture traffic during these events. You can analyze it in Network Monitor or use Wireshark to gain additional insight into what is going on. TCP handshakes &amp; RSTs might contribute to some performance issues, but I don&#8217;t think the number you mention is excessive when you consider how many packets are actually in a transaction. Are you using large pings (&gt;= 1000bytes)? See if the packet size matters on the network. Maybe there&#8217;s a device with bad MTU settings. Also check duplex / speed settings along the path. These should always be hard-set for servers to switch interfaces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tbaror</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/netstat-s-for-tcp-statistics-for-ipv4/#comment-68201</link>
		<dc:creator>tbaror</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-68201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reason i am asking about &lt;b&gt; Failed Connection Attempts .&lt;/b&gt;

 trying to identify issue i got with 2003 STD servers.
those servers working with agent that transfer files to remote storage , 
issue appearing each 3~4 days one of the servers 5 of them report fail transfer for almost 1~2 min.
*on the servers itself there is no event that indicate link loos or what 
ever for those events
i wrote a script that trying each 1 sec check if path file exist on remote 
storage , in case of more than 100ms delay its start fping to see if there 
is network delay ,and results form fping are saying everything  its ok 0.5 
~.0.8 replay.

since i run the script on those servers i have correlated agent events to 
script and got about 10 sec and more for file path checking in the same 
time.
now when i am doing netstat -es on the servers i get
0 Discards and 0 Errors and only place i get errors is at TCP Statistics for 
IPv4
Failed Connection Attempts = 5064
my question is that indicate that the issue exist on the other counterpart 
(storage) IO or bandwidth related issue?.
Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason i am asking about <b> Failed Connection Attempts .</b></p>
<p> trying to identify issue i got with 2003 STD servers.<br />
those servers working with agent that transfer files to remote storage ,<br />
issue appearing each 3~4 days one of the servers 5 of them report fail transfer for almost 1~2 min.<br />
*on the servers itself there is no event that indicate link loos or what<br />
ever for those events<br />
i wrote a script that trying each 1 sec check if path file exist on remote<br />
storage , in case of more than 100ms delay its start fping to see if there<br />
is network delay ,and results form fping are saying everything  its ok 0.5<br />
~.0.8 replay.</p>
<p>since i run the script on those servers i have correlated agent events to<br />
script and got about 10 sec and more for file path checking in the same<br />
time.<br />
now when i am doing netstat -es on the servers i get<br />
0 Discards and 0 Errors and only place i get errors is at TCP Statistics for<br />
IPv4<br />
Failed Connection Attempts = 5064<br />
my question is that indicate that the issue exist on the other counterpart<br />
(storage) IO or bandwidth related issue?.<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.012 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 296/299 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-19 12:59:37 -->