 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Migration Plan for 9i Linux to 10g Solaris</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/migration-plan-for-9i-linux-to-10g-solaris/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/migration-plan-for-9i-linux-to-10g-solaris/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:39:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: mrdenny</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/migration-plan-for-9i-linux-to-10g-solaris/#comment-52170</link>
		<dc:creator>mrdenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 02:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-52170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t have a plan handy for you, but I can tell you that testing will be VERY important.  At a prior company we decided to upgrade from 9i to 10g without testing (not my idea, or my project) and we had very bad results.  The 10g optimizer didn&#039;t like several of the queries which we were using and the Oracle database (running on a very nice new IBM server) was running slower than an Access database.  Oracle ended up having to spend three weeks writing us a custom build of the database which basically had the 9i optimizer put back in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have a plan handy for you, but I can tell you that testing will be VERY important.  At a prior company we decided to upgrade from 9i to 10g without testing (not my idea, or my project) and we had very bad results.  The 10g optimizer didn&#8217;t like several of the queries which we were using and the Oracle database (running on a very nice new IBM server) was running slower than an Access database.  Oracle ended up having to spend three weeks writing us a custom build of the database which basically had the 9i optimizer put back in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/8 queries in 0.012 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 269/270 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-20 12:56:18 -->