 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Migrating mailboxes from Exchange 2000 to Exchange 2003</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/migrating-mailboxes-form-exchange-2000-to-exchange-2003/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/migrating-mailboxes-form-exchange-2000-to-exchange-2003/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 16:32:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: stevesz</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/migrating-mailboxes-form-exchange-2000-to-exchange-2003/#comment-87890</link>
		<dc:creator>stevesz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 20:46:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-87890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmmm, I thought that perhaps others might jump in and help you here, but, it appears not to have happened yet. If there is something out there that can help estimate the time it will take to do a mailbox migration, I&#039;d also like to know about it.

The reason I am back is that I realized  that I did not mention anything about the Deleted Items folder. If you have a retention period set that will automatically delete messages from this folder after a period of time, you may wish to reduce that period to a minimum during your migration, thus you will have less to move. If there is no policy set, you can try to send out a memo that will be followed by all the users (yeah, right, what have I been smoking) to empty Deleted Items, or you can force it. There may be a problem with this scenario, though. I have seen users use deleted items just as any other folder--to store messages they may need at a later time. I&#039;ll never know where they come up with this idea. It&#039;s like, &quot;OK, I have some fresh fruit here. I think I&#039;ll store it in the kitchen trash until I eat it.&quot; Yuck, what a concept. Anyway, empty or nearly empty Deleted Items folders can help speed a migration.

Some though should also be given to reducing the size of the Sent Items folder also.This can be a very large folder as well. Reducing the size of it can help speed the migration. I haven&#039;t been able to find a good way to make this happen. You just need to cooperation of the users on this one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, I thought that perhaps others might jump in and help you here, but, it appears not to have happened yet. If there is something out there that can help estimate the time it will take to do a mailbox migration, I&#8217;d also like to know about it.</p>
<p>The reason I am back is that I realized  that I did not mention anything about the Deleted Items folder. If you have a retention period set that will automatically delete messages from this folder after a period of time, you may wish to reduce that period to a minimum during your migration, thus you will have less to move. If there is no policy set, you can try to send out a memo that will be followed by all the users (yeah, right, what have I been smoking) to empty Deleted Items, or you can force it. There may be a problem with this scenario, though. I have seen users use deleted items just as any other folder&#8211;to store messages they may need at a later time. I&#8217;ll never know where they come up with this idea. It&#8217;s like, &#8220;OK, I have some fresh fruit here. I think I&#8217;ll store it in the kitchen trash until I eat it.&#8221; Yuck, what a concept. Anyway, empty or nearly empty Deleted Items folders can help speed a migration.</p>
<p>Some though should also be given to reducing the size of the Sent Items folder also.This can be a very large folder as well. Reducing the size of it can help speed the migration. I haven&#8217;t been able to find a good way to make this happen. You just need to cooperation of the users on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.039 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 267/273 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-25 17:19:31 -->