<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: message MEPO039 &#8211; &#8220;Goods receipt posted unvaluated due to multiple account assignments&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/message-mepo039-goods-receipt-posted-unvaluated-due-to-multiple-account-assignments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/message-mepo039-goods-receipt-posted-unvaluated-due-to-multiple-account-assignments/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 09:42:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: coffey</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/message-mepo039-goods-receipt-posted-unvaluated-due-to-multiple-account-assignments/#comment-38122</link>
		<dc:creator>coffey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 18:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-38122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds like the gr-non val flag on the item details is  being set which causes the symptoms your describing. Check your line items to make sure this flag is blank on multiple account assignments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like the gr-non val flag on the item details is  being set which causes the symptoms your describing. Check your line items to make sure this flag is blank on multiple account assignments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: solutions1</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/message-mepo039-goods-receipt-posted-unvaluated-due-to-multiple-account-assignments/#comment-38123</link>
		<dc:creator>solutions1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 08:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-38123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Someone more familiar with R/3 MM may know exactly how to make the split account feature work, but it indeed works to create committments for each split.

Note that not using this feature creates its own problems in terms of receiving, governance, perhaps pricing, etc. If you create two PO&#039;s (which would be needed if the order quanity is 1), it would look as if the purchaser is trying to bypass authority levels.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone more familiar with R/3 MM may know exactly how to make the split account feature work, but it indeed works to create committments for each split.</p>
<p>Note that not using this feature creates its own problems in terms of receiving, governance, perhaps pricing, etc. If you create two PO&#8217;s (which would be needed if the order quanity is 1), it would look as if the purchaser is trying to bypass authority levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SAPFAQ1_6963</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/message-mepo039-goods-receipt-posted-unvaluated-due-to-multiple-account-assignments/#comment-38124</link>
		<dc:creator>SAPFAQ1_6963</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 11:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-38124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello and thank you for your response.  I have the multiple account assignment data, in this case indicating distribution 50%, 50%.  When I save the PO, the system gives me a warning MEPO039.  Subsequent GRs post unvaluated.  I think this is just standard functionality that GRs post unvaluated when using multiple account assignments for a p.o. line, and the valuation happens at time of invoice receipt.  The finance user wishes that the multiple account assignment for a p.o. line functionality could be used and have the system valuate at time of goods receipt.  I have told the user they should be created multiple p.o.lines each with single account assignment in that case.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello and thank you for your response.  I have the multiple account assignment data, in this case indicating distribution 50%, 50%.  When I save the PO, the system gives me a warning MEPO039.  Subsequent GRs post unvaluated.  I think this is just standard functionality that GRs post unvaluated when using multiple account assignments for a p.o. line, and the valuation happens at time of invoice receipt.  The finance user wishes that the multiple account assignment for a p.o. line functionality could be used and have the system valuate at time of goods receipt.  I have told the user they should be created multiple p.o.lines each with single account assignment in that case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.014 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 296/299 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-06-20 10:11:18 -->