 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Loopback Processing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/loopback-processing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/loopback-processing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 05:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: dlr</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/loopback-processing/#comment-68115</link>
		<dc:creator>dlr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-68115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I already had a security group built containing just the effected computers with AGP &amp; Read permissions, but I think where my mistake was, is that I also had &quot;authenticated&quot; users in the SCOPE/SECURITY FILTERING with those same permissions.  I went in and changed &quot;authenticated&quot; users to Read ONLY, which made them disappear from the SCOPE/SECURITY FILTERING.  I will try this and see if it works.  Thank You.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I already had a security group built containing just the effected computers with AGP &amp; Read permissions, but I think where my mistake was, is that I also had &#8220;authenticated&#8221; users in the SCOPE/SECURITY FILTERING with those same permissions.  I went in and changed &#8220;authenticated&#8221; users to Read ONLY, which made them disappear from the SCOPE/SECURITY FILTERING.  I will try this and see if it works.  Thank You.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjb0222</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/loopback-processing/#comment-68114</link>
		<dc:creator>pjb0222</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 19:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-68114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When you use loopback like this, the policy restrictions are all based on the machine, not the user.  Filtration must be made at the machnine level.  Use either a separate OU or a machine group to filter which machine have this special policy applied.

When you filter, you want everyone to be able to read the policy but only machines that are members of the group to apply the policy.  So check the SCOPE &#124; SECURITY FILTERING and ensure only the filtering group is in there.

Finally, the order the policies applies is important.  Watch for that as a potential issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you use loopback like this, the policy restrictions are all based on the machine, not the user.  Filtration must be made at the machnine level.  Use either a separate OU or a machine group to filter which machine have this special policy applied.</p>
<p>When you filter, you want everyone to be able to read the policy but only machines that are members of the group to apply the policy.  So check the SCOPE | SECURITY FILTERING and ensure only the filtering group is in there.</p>
<p>Finally, the order the policies applies is important.  Watch for that as a potential issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.015 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 282/285 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-20 06:44:17 -->