<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Limiting users to one concurrent login in Active Directory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/limiting-users-to-one-concurrent-login-in-active-directory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/limiting-users-to-one-concurrent-login-in-active-directory/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 19:19:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: jlees</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/limiting-users-to-one-concurrent-login-in-active-directory/#comment-52048</link>
		<dc:creator>jlees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 15:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-52048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an awesome solution to the posting. Another tool that people seem to have been raving about was &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.userlock.com&quot;&gt;userlock&lt;/a&gt;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an awesome solution to the posting. Another tool that people seem to have been raving about was <a href="http://www.userlock.com">userlock</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amigus</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/limiting-users-to-one-concurrent-login-in-active-directory/#comment-46268</link>
		<dc:creator>amigus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-46268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If all you&#039;re worried about is an audit trail why bother?  Having a good authentication scheme, audit policy and signed usage agreement stating users should not share passwords and that they are responsible for the actions performed using their accounts, you have an audit trail that would stand up in a court of law or a board room.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If all you&#8217;re worried about is an audit trail why bother?  Having a good authentication scheme, audit policy and signed usage agreement stating users should not share passwords and that they are responsible for the actions performed using their accounts, you have an audit trail that would stand up in a court of law or a board room.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spadasoe</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/limiting-users-to-one-concurrent-login-in-active-directory/#comment-46269</link>
		<dc:creator>spadasoe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 09:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-46269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good 3rd party solution is userlock http://www.pnltools.com/productinfo.asp?productid=17&amp;refid=138
I use it in my AD and have no problems. It is easy to set up and manage, prvides alerts and other tools]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good 3rd party solution is userlock <a href="http://www.pnltools.com/productinfo.asp?productid=17&#038;refid=138" rel="nofollow">http://www.pnltools.com/productinfo.asp?productid=17&#038;refid=138</a><br />
I use it in my AD and have no problems. It is easy to set up and manage, prvides alerts and other tools</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juscelino</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/limiting-users-to-one-concurrent-login-in-active-directory/#comment-46270</link>
		<dc:creator>juscelino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2005 17:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-46270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You stated:  &quot;Microsoft say we can only do this by limiting them to one designated machine, this is not possible for us.&quot;

Why not?  Can you be more specific?  In Active Directory Users and Computers, if you look in a specific user&#039;s properties, the option is clearly there under the &quot;Account&quot; tab, then clicking on &quot;Log On To...&quot; setting...

Please clarify if I am misunderstanding your issue...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You stated:  &#8220;Microsoft say we can only do this by limiting them to one designated machine, this is not possible for us.&#8221;</p>
<p>Why not?  Can you be more specific?  In Active Directory Users and Computers, if you look in a specific user&#8217;s properties, the option is clearly there under the &#8220;Account&#8221; tab, then clicking on &#8220;Log On To&#8230;&#8221; setting&#8230;</p>
<p>Please clarify if I am misunderstanding your issue&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.020 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 310/313 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-06-19 20:36:08 -->