 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Joining a video conference call with a webcam?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/joining-a-video-conference-call-with-a-webcam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/joining-a-video-conference-call-with-a-webcam/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 03:14:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: snapper70</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/joining-a-video-conference-call-with-a-webcam/#comment-55818</link>
		<dc:creator>snapper70</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-55818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Polycom has a PVX PC-based software package which could probably participate in an IP-based call, providing you have the multipoint software on the HDX units, or a separate video bridge.  You MAY find it degrades the overall video quality somewhat, though; unless you have a good video bridge that can do speed/video transcoding.  The built-in  bridge in the HDX units MAY drop the video quality to the lowest-common-denominator, so adding the PVX would drop the call quality to CIF resolution (something like 352x288) rather than the higher one normally supported by the HDX units.

I believe it&#039;s fairly inexpensive - $200-$400; and works well if you have:
1)  Fast/reliable connection.  Remember your DSL or cable connection has limited upstream (300-600k)
2)  Fast PC.  Real-time video processing can be fairly demanding - although there is a patch required
        on that software with dual-core pentiums.
3)  If running over  a VPN connection, you may have to play with network settings, so it runs over the VPN
       adapter, rather than using the non-tunnelled connection]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polycom has a PVX PC-based software package which could probably participate in an IP-based call, providing you have the multipoint software on the HDX units, or a separate video bridge.  You MAY find it degrades the overall video quality somewhat, though; unless you have a good video bridge that can do speed/video transcoding.  The built-in  bridge in the HDX units MAY drop the video quality to the lowest-common-denominator, so adding the PVX would drop the call quality to CIF resolution (something like 352&#215;288) rather than the higher one normally supported by the HDX units.</p>
<p>I believe it&#8217;s fairly inexpensive &#8211; $200-$400; and works well if you have:<br />
1)  Fast/reliable connection.  Remember your DSL or cable connection has limited upstream (300-600k)<br />
2)  Fast PC.  Real-time video processing can be fairly demanding &#8211; although there is a patch required<br />
        on that software with dual-core pentiums.<br />
3)  If running over  a VPN connection, you may have to play with network settings, so it runs over the VPN<br />
       adapter, rather than using the non-tunnelled connection</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.043 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 267/273 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-19 07:58:46 -->