 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: JCL wait command</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/jcl-wait-command/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/jcl-wait-command/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 03:14:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Featured Member: Sunsetrider - ITKE Community Blog</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/jcl-wait-command/#comment-93699</link>
		<dc:creator>Featured Member: Sunsetrider - ITKE Community Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 06:12:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-93699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] JCL wait command [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] JCL wait command [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meandyou</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/jcl-wait-command/#comment-91852</link>
		<dc:creator>meandyou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 14:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-91852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Basing the execution of one job on the completion of another job is best left to scheduling software.   Because, maybe, you only want the second job to run if the first job completes with a RC of less than 5 (or some other condition).   
 
Without a job scheduler, you will need manual intervention from operators.  Not a good thing.  (In the old days, that is how we ran a series of job streams.  Operator would get out the Run Book and submit a job.  Then based on the return codes would refer to the Run Book to see what job to run next.  Not good.)

You might also consider having the first job submit the second job.  Using IF/THEN/ELSE in the first job you can decide to submit the second one or not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basing the execution of one job on the completion of another job is best left to scheduling software.   Because, maybe, you only want the second job to run if the first job completes with a RC of less than 5 (or some other condition).   </p>
<p>Without a job scheduler, you will need manual intervention from operators.  Not a good thing.  (In the old days, that is how we ran a series of job streams.  Operator would get out the Run Book and submit a job.  Then based on the return codes would refer to the Run Book to see what job to run next.  Not good.)</p>
<p>You might also consider having the first job submit the second job.  Using IF/THEN/ELSE in the first job you can decide to submit the second one or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.013 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 281/284 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-19 19:52:33 -->