<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iSCSI technology for Oracle Rac</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/iscsi-technology-for-oracle-rac/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/iscsi-technology-for-oracle-rac/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 04:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mrdenny</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/iscsi-technology-for-oracle-rac/#comment-65063</link>
		<dc:creator>mrdenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-65063</guid>
		<description>If you are going to spend the kind of money needed to get RAC running, don't screw around with iSCSI.  Use fibre channel.  It's faster, has quicker retries if something doesn't get where its going, and its the gold standard for storage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are going to spend the kind of money needed to get RAC running, don&#8217;t screw around with iSCSI.  Use fibre channel.  It&#8217;s faster, has quicker retries if something doesn&#8217;t get where its going, and its the gold standard for storage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->