<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Twain most popular with desktop multi function devices or desktop scanners?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/is-twain-most-popular-with-desktop-multi-function-devices-or-desktop-scanners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/is-twain-most-popular-with-desktop-multi-function-devices-or-desktop-scanners/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:32:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: TomLiotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/is-twain-most-popular-with-desktop-multi-function-devices-or-desktop-scanners/#comment-114736</link>
		<dc:creator>TomLiotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 11:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/is-twain-most-popular-with-desktop-multi-function-devices-or-desktop-scanners/#comment-114736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry, the &#039;Edit&#039; function still doesn&#039;t work on comments even after six months. I&#039;ll just enter the comment again:
Your question can be taken multiple ways. However, I don’t think it matters how&#160;it&#039;s taken. I think it’s correct regardless of interpretation.
&#160;
But in any case, there doesn’t seem to be any useful point to the question. It seems to be accurate, but possibly misleading.
&#160;
Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, the &#8216;Edit&#8217; function still doesn&#8217;t work on comments even after six months. I&#8217;ll just enter the comment again:<br />
Your question can be taken multiple ways. However, I don’t think it matters how&nbsp;it&#8217;s taken. I think it’s correct regardless of interpretation.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
But in any case, there doesn’t seem to be any useful point to the question. It seems to be accurate, but possibly misleading.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomLiotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/is-twain-most-popular-with-desktop-multi-function-devices-or-desktop-scanners/#comment-114735</link>
		<dc:creator>TomLiotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 11:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/is-twain-most-popular-with-desktop-multi-function-devices-or-desktop-scanners/#comment-114735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;EM&gt;...it is most popular with desktop multi function printers and desktop scanners?&lt;/EM&gt;
&#160;
Your question can be taken multiple ways. However, I don&#039;t think it maters how your question is interpreted. I think it&#039;s no matter how it&#039;s interpreted.
&#160;
But no matter how it&#039;s intreted, there doesn&#039;t seem to be any useful point to the question. It seems to be accurate, but possibly misleading.
&#160;
Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>&#8230;it is most popular with desktop multi function printers and desktop scanners?</em><br />
&nbsp;<br />
Your question can be taken multiple ways. However, I don&#8217;t think it maters how your question is interpreted. I think it&#8217;s no matter how it&#8217;s interpreted.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
But no matter how it&#8217;s intreted, there doesn&#8217;t seem to be any useful point to the question. It seems to be accurate, but possibly misleading.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.047 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 281/287 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-06-20 10:45:00 -->