 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is there a way to disable Windows firewall without deactivating McAfee firewall?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/is-there-a-way-to-disable-windows-firewall-without-deactivating-mcafee-firewall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/is-there-a-way-to-disable-windows-firewall-without-deactivating-mcafee-firewall/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:11:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: pressler2904</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/is-there-a-way-to-disable-windows-firewall-without-deactivating-mcafee-firewall/#comment-58825</link>
		<dc:creator>pressler2904</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 16:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-58825</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having been involved with the configuration of desktop systems in a variety of environments for several years noe, I would strongly suggest NOT running the McAfee firewall (or Symantec/Norton either for that matter).  Both are rather resource intensive.

In the course of my testing and (informal) research, I would suggest instead using Comodo firewall.

Now i realize that there are people who swear by McAfee and Symantec just as much as I swear at them, but unless you have a relatively fast system (three years old or newer), you WILL see a performance hit with either of the big two firewalls in place.  Comodo is relatively lightweight, and has proven to be effective in a wide variety of situations and against a wide variety of threats.

Note that I AM NOT associated with Comodo in any way except as a user, and do not receive any compensation from them...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having been involved with the configuration of desktop systems in a variety of environments for several years noe, I would strongly suggest NOT running the McAfee firewall (or Symantec/Norton either for that matter).  Both are rather resource intensive.</p>
<p>In the course of my testing and (informal) research, I would suggest instead using Comodo firewall.</p>
<p>Now i realize that there are people who swear by McAfee and Symantec just as much as I swear at them, but unless you have a relatively fast system (three years old or newer), you WILL see a performance hit with either of the big two firewalls in place.  Comodo is relatively lightweight, and has proven to be effective in a wide variety of situations and against a wide variety of threats.</p>
<p>Note that I AM NOT associated with Comodo in any way except as a user, and do not receive any compensation from them&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IT Knowledge Exchange Community Update for 12/23/08 - ITKE Community Blog</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/is-there-a-way-to-disable-windows-firewall-without-deactivating-mcafee-firewall/#comment-58773</link>
		<dc:creator>IT Knowledge Exchange Community Update for 12/23/08 - ITKE Community Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 15:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-58773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] &gt;&gt; Is there a way to disable Windows firewall without deactivating McAfee firewall? [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &gt;&gt; Is there a way to disable Windows firewall without deactivating McAfee firewall? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kevinbeaver</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/is-there-a-way-to-disable-windows-firewall-without-deactivating-mcafee-firewall/#comment-58649</link>
		<dc:creator>kevinbeaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-58649</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would definitely choose one firewall and stick with it...using multiple ones will not only cause problems, it also uses resources (CPU/memory/network) that don&#039;t need to be used.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would definitely choose one firewall and stick with it&#8230;using multiple ones will not only cause problems, it also uses resources (CPU/memory/network) that don&#8217;t need to be used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flame</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/is-there-a-way-to-disable-windows-firewall-without-deactivating-mcafee-firewall/#comment-58613</link>
		<dc:creator>flame</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-58613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After installing SP2 you should go ahead and install SP3 you can get it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/downloadS/details.aspx?familyid=5B33B5A8-5E76-401F-BE08-1E1555D4F3D4&amp;displaylang=en&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After installing SP2 you should go ahead and install SP3 you can get it <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloadS/details.aspx?familyid=5B33B5A8-5E76-401F-BE08-1E1555D4F3D4&amp;displaylang=en">here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/8 queries in 0.036 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 311/312 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-22 01:02:50 -->