Flame
14495 pts. | Dec 15 2008 9:05PM GMT
After installing SP2 you should go ahead and install SP3 you can get it here
KevinBeaver
7610 pts. | Dec 16 2008 3:54PM GMT
I would definitely choose one firewall and stick with <a href="http://it...us" title="http://it... " target="_blank">it…us</a>ing multiple ones will not only cause problems, it also uses resources (CPU/memory/network) that don’t need to be used.
IT Knowledge Exchange Community Update for 12/23/08 - ITKE Community Blog
0 pts. | Dec 23 2008 3:55PM GMT
[...] >> Is there a way to disable Windows firewall without deactivating McAfee firewall? [...]
Pressler2904
2165 pts. | Dec 24 2008 4:09PM GMT
Having been involved with the configuration of desktop systems in a variety of environments for several years noe, I would strongly suggest NOT running the McAfee firewall (or Symantec/Norton either for that matter). Both are rather resource intensive.
In the course of my testing and (informal) research, I would suggest instead using Comodo firewall.
Now i realize that there are people who swear by McAfee and Symantec just as much as I swear at them, but unless you have a relatively fast system (three years old or newer), you WILL see a performance hit with either of the big two firewalls in place. Comodo is relatively lightweight, and has proven to be effective in a wide variety of situations and against a wide variety of threats.
Note that I AM NOT associated with Comodo in any way except as a user, and do not receive any compensation from them…






