 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: is it possible that two different technologies (adhoc and ethernet ) work at same time on Data Link Layer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/is-it-possible-that-two-different-technologies-adhoc-and-ethernet-work-at-same-time-on-data-link-layer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/is-it-possible-that-two-different-technologies-adhoc-and-ethernet-work-at-same-time-on-data-link-layer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 01:40:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: petkoa</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/is-it-possible-that-two-different-technologies-adhoc-and-ethernet-work-at-same-time-on-data-link-layer/#comment-69630</link>
		<dc:creator>petkoa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-69630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In fact, bringing up an interface with correctly set IP, broadcast and netmask &quot;automagically&quot; will set a route to network defined by the broadcast and netmask to go through this interface. If you activate IP forwarding (routing) between interfaces then any communications - ping included - between 192.168.1.2 and 172.168.15.2 would be possible.

By,

Petko A.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In fact, bringing up an interface with correctly set IP, broadcast and netmask &#8220;automagically&#8221; will set a route to network defined by the broadcast and netmask to go through this interface. If you activate IP forwarding (routing) between interfaces then any communications &#8211; ping included &#8211; between 192.168.1.2 and 172.168.15.2 would be possible.</p>
<p>By,</p>
<p>Petko A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lisaphifer</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/is-it-possible-that-two-different-technologies-adhoc-and-ethernet-work-at-same-time-on-data-link-layer/#comment-69555</link>
		<dc:creator>lisaphifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-69555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The easiest way to accomplish this is to enable Internet Connection Sharing (ICS) on one of the two connections - just check the ICS box on the Connection Properties/Advanced panel. For example, enable Internet Connection Sharing on your Ethernet (192.168.1.1) to let another wireless Ad Hoc client (172.168.15.2) ping any upstream LAN client (192.168.1.x) through your dual-homed PC&#039;s wireless Ad Hoc connection (172.168.15.1). ICS is best used where you want one-way routing (as with a shared Internet connection). If you want bidirectional routing, enable RRAS and configure routes to relay traffic sent to 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0 via 192.168.1.1 and traffic sent to 172.168.15.0/255.255.255.0 via 172.168.15.1.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The easiest way to accomplish this is to enable Internet Connection Sharing (ICS) on one of the two connections &#8211; just check the ICS box on the Connection Properties/Advanced panel. For example, enable Internet Connection Sharing on your Ethernet (192.168.1.1) to let another wireless Ad Hoc client (172.168.15.2) ping any upstream LAN client (192.168.1.x) through your dual-homed PC&#8217;s wireless Ad Hoc connection (172.168.15.1). ICS is best used where you want one-way routing (as with a shared Internet connection). If you want bidirectional routing, enable RRAS and configure routes to relay traffic sent to 192.168.1.0/255.255.255.0 via 192.168.1.1 and traffic sent to 172.168.15.0/255.255.255.0 via 172.168.15.1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spymoose</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/is-it-possible-that-two-different-technologies-adhoc-and-ethernet-work-at-same-time-on-data-link-layer/#comment-65208</link>
		<dc:creator>spymoose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-65208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There shouldnt be any issues with them working together on the data link layer. I would recommend after you get the rerouting setup you can test the settings. Just set your DNS to circumvent the primary connection and use the backup to make sure both can be accessed at the same time. Unless you have load balancing equipment they won&#039;t rely on each other for a shared connection, there would be a primary and secondary so if one communication path goes down the other should pickup.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There shouldnt be any issues with them working together on the data link layer. I would recommend after you get the rerouting setup you can test the settings. Just set your DNS to circumvent the primary connection and use the backup to make sure both can be accessed at the same time. Unless you have load balancing equipment they won&#8217;t rely on each other for a shared connection, there would be a primary and secondary so if one communication path goes down the other should pickup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/8 queries in 0.037 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 297/298 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-26 07:17:50 -->