I am specifying a new server and have been told that a 3 drive RAID 5 array is not a good idea as I will not have a bootable drive in the event of a array controller failure. A better idea is O/S on a RAID1 mirror with apps too, and data on RAID 5 array of 3 drives. Any comments please.
Software/Hardware used:
ASKED:
April 24, 2009 2:26 PM
UPDATED:
April 19, 2013 6:41 PM
RAID 5 accomplishes both techniques of RAID 0 and RAID 1. There are other benefits of RAID 5. You’ll just have to take my word for it. RAID 5 requires a minimum of three drives and it is recommended that all drives on the system be of the same size. The more drives you have on the server, the better RAID 5 will perform.
RAID 5 is the version most often recommended. Because the price of disk drives have drastically dropped, the cost of implementing RAID 5 is now within most companies budgets. The only time RAID 5 could fail is if two drives were to fail at the same time.
raid 10 is just raid 1 + raid 0 — both are paired so you need at least 4 drives