 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IPLSRC a and b</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/iplsrc-a-and-b/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/iplsrc-a-and-b/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 07:52:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: tomliotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/iplsrc-a-and-b/#comment-70157</link>
		<dc:creator>tomliotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-70157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do mean by &quot;the importance&quot;?

Do you mean what is the importance of following any IBM instructions to IPL from the A or B side? Or are you simply wondering if you need to be concerned about it in the normal course of maintenance?

For the first, if IBM gives you instructions to IPL to either A or B before doing any following step, the importance is that the next step will probably fail if you don&#039;t do it. Technically, there&#039;s a chance of catastrophic (probably software disaster) failure.

For the second, you can usually ignore it and let the system manage it. A decade or so ago, it could be much more important; but I haven&#039;t had to pay attention for years. (Except from explicit IBM instruction.)

Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do mean by &#8220;the importance&#8221;?</p>
<p>Do you mean what is the importance of following any IBM instructions to IPL from the A or B side? Or are you simply wondering if you need to be concerned about it in the normal course of maintenance?</p>
<p>For the first, if IBM gives you instructions to IPL to either A or B before doing any following step, the importance is that the next step will probably fail if you don&#8217;t do it. Technically, there&#8217;s a chance of catastrophic (probably software disaster) failure.</p>
<p>For the second, you can usually ignore it and let the system manage it. A decade or so ago, it could be much more important; but I haven&#8217;t had to pay attention for years. (Except from explicit IBM instruction.)</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.044 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 267/273 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-18 10:55:05 -->