<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IP Addressing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/ip-addressing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/ip-addressing/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:39:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: jester42</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/ip-addressing/#comment-38298</link>
		<dc:creator>jester42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Dec 2004 20:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-38298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[check out learntosubnet.com for help
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>check out learntosubnet.com for help</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mable44</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/ip-addressing/#comment-38299</link>
		<dc:creator>mable44</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-38299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In order for computers/servers to correctly see each other over the network they would need to be on the same subnet mask.  If you  begin changing the subnet mask on some, not all, those on the subnet 255.255.255.0 will communicate with each, and those 255.255.255.128 will communicate.  You could use a route command to interface the 2, but if there are manageable number of computers to techs I suggest changing to the IP addresses scheme you prefer at one time. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order for computers/servers to correctly see each other over the network they would need to be on the same subnet mask.  If you  begin changing the subnet mask on some, not all, those on the subnet 255.255.255.0 will communicate with each, and those 255.255.255.128 will communicate.  You could use a route command to interface the 2, but if there are manageable number of computers to techs I suggest changing to the IP addresses scheme you prefer at one time. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrwizard</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/ip-addressing/#comment-38300</link>
		<dc:creator>mrwizard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2004 08:10:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-38300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What a coincidence.
Just had this happen to a client a few weeks ago.

Here&#039;s what I did...
Early in the week set DHCP lease time to 1 day.
After-hours on Friday I changed the subnet mask on the DHCP and all static IP devices.
On Monday morning everything was working fine, DHCP renewed all leases with new subnet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a coincidence.<br />
Just had this happen to a client a few weeks ago.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s what I did&#8230;<br />
Early in the week set DHCP lease time to 1 day.<br />
After-hours on Friday I changed the subnet mask on the DHCP and all static IP devices.<br />
On Monday morning everything was working fine, DHCP renewed all leases with new subnet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marchullegie</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/ip-addressing/#comment-38301</link>
		<dc:creator>marchullegie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2004 07:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-38301</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I Agree with Nandan: leave the old range (and mask) unchanged. Start a new range (and mask) and add a route-entry for that range in all routing tables which are on the path. Start that with the DHCP scope (after you added the routing entry) will give you time to change the static entries one-by-one.
Only adjusting the mask will most likely cause communication problems since the route is not changed.
(an open door: when you are working in a team, communicate your planned change to prevent anyone still acting the old way).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Agree with Nandan: leave the old range (and mask) unchanged. Start a new range (and mask) and add a route-entry for that range in all routing tables which are on the path. Start that with the DHCP scope (after you added the routing entry) will give you time to change the static entries one-by-one.<br />
Only adjusting the mask will most likely cause communication problems since the route is not changed.<br />
(an open door: when you are working in a team, communicate your planned change to prevent anyone still acting the old way).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.008 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 310/313 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-06-20 05:04:54 -->