 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: inserting many columns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/inserting-many-columns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/inserting-many-columns/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 03:14:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: carlosdl</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/inserting-many-columns/#comment-112016</link>
		<dc:creator>carlosdl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 19:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/inserting-many-columns/#comment-112016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My first recommenadtion would be to review your database design.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first recommenadtion would be to review your database design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomLiotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/inserting-many-columns/#comment-111965</link>
		<dc:creator>TomLiotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 21:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/inserting-many-columns/#comment-111965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, Foxpro... you&#039;re right. I saw the &lt;EM&gt;SQL commands&lt;/EM&gt; and missed &lt;EM&gt;Foxpro 2.6&lt;/EM&gt;. The reference to &quot;database&quot; makes a little more sense.
&#160;
But the basic issue is still the purpose of a &quot;variable&quot; for this. By understanding what is expected of a &quot;variable&quot;, an answer might be possible regardless of the software. Why not simply add the desired columns and be done with it? What &lt;EM&gt;business problem&lt;/EM&gt; is needing to be solved? (Especially for a version that&#039;s going on a couple decades old. If the columns weren&#039;t needed a year ago, what made them important now?)
&#160;
Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, Foxpro&#8230; you&#8217;re right. I saw the <em>SQL commands</em> and missed <em>Foxpro 2.6</em>. The reference to &#8220;database&#8221; makes a little more sense.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
But the basic issue is still the purpose of a &#8220;variable&#8221; for this. By understanding what is expected of a &#8220;variable&#8221;, an answer might be possible regardless of the software. Why not simply add the desired columns and be done with it? What <em>business problem</em> is needing to be solved? (Especially for a version that&#8217;s going on a couple decades old. If the columns weren&#8217;t needed a year ago, what made them important now?)<br />
&nbsp;<br />
Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philpl1jb</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/inserting-many-columns/#comment-111964</link>
		<dc:creator>philpl1jb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 20:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/inserting-many-columns/#comment-111964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sorry Tom, I think you missed the software/hardware used.&#160; This question as stated makes sense for Foxpro which is both a programming language and dbms where each table is called a dbf, data base files.&#160; &#160;However, rather than add columns to the table you probably need a second table with a key matching the first table, a day number field which is also part of the key and a value field.&#160; That would start you off with a normalized data structure.&#160;Phil]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Tom, I think you missed the software/hardware used.&nbsp; This question as stated makes sense for Foxpro which is both a programming language and dbms where each table is called a dbf, data base files.&nbsp; &nbsp;However, rather than add columns to the table you probably need a second table with a key matching the first table, a day number field which is also part of the key and a value field.&nbsp; That would start you off with a normalized data structure.&nbsp;Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomLiotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/inserting-many-columns/#comment-111955</link>
		<dc:creator>TomLiotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2012 10:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/inserting-many-columns/#comment-111955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Columns would be added to a &#039;table&#039; rather than to a &#039;database&#039;. But if you want to &quot;pass a variable&quot;, what are you expecting to &quot;pass&quot; it to? When anyone wants to pass a variable, it usually implies some function or procedure that would be used multiple times with different values. How would you add the columns to a table multiple times? -- Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Columns would be added to a &#8216;table&#8217; rather than to a &#8216;database&#8217;. But if you want to &#8220;pass a variable&#8221;, what are you expecting to &#8220;pass&#8221; it to? When anyone wants to pass a variable, it usually implies some function or procedure that would be used multiple times with different values. How would you add the columns to a table multiple times? &#8212; Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.036 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 309/315 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-19 05:12:49 -->