Flame
14495 pts. | Feb 3 2009 7:30PM GMT
A hub is the least secure of these devices. Packet sniffers have a MUCH easier time seeing more (or possibly ALL) traffic on the network. They are also “contention based” This means that collisions can happen when two devices try to put a packet on the network at the same time. With a hub since the packet shows up at more places you will get more collisions. On a busy network, a hub can REALLY slow things down.
Good Luck!
-Flame
AndOrTech
515 pts. | Feb 12 2009 7:03PM GMT
JUST TO MUDDY THE WATERS.
Keep in mind many new switches also do routing on some level. In some cases it is better than a router which are usually just layer 3.
For example: In many of my large networks the gateway will not be my external router (firewall) it is a routing switch. (I like to use the HP 5400 series as it is a layer 4 switch.)
Hubs are hard to find new anymore with good reason. The Hub was great for small installs with little traffic. For large installs they were a disaster.
I usually allways reccomend a switch for internal and a firewall for my outside.
Great article for covering the basics!
BlankReg
11280 pts. | May 26 2009 6:33AM GMT
Hubs still have their uses. I always keep a 10/100 one handy for use with Wireshark, as it allows me to monitor the data with only a disruption while it is inserted into the circuit.
Hubs - Physical Layer 1 - knows nothing
Switch - Data Link Layer 2 - knows MAC addresses
Router - Network Layer 3 - knows Protocol (IP etc)
Troy Tate
0 pts. | May 26 2009 2:37PM GMT
A hub by nature is half-duplex. This means that clients cannot talk & listen to traffic at the same time. As has already been mentioned collisions are a normal occurrence on a network with a hub and can significantly reduce throughput.
In the IT trenches? So am I - read my IT-Trenches blog






