How close do other change management products keep COBOL compile parms for CRTCBLPGM, CRTBDNCBL when replacing an object? Have looked at Hawkeye's Mass Compile but had to tell them a while back they were not keeping the Activation group was defaulting to QILE even if the object it was replacing was something different. Also currently Parms like.....
OPM...Source listing options.......: *SRCDBG goes to*SOURCE after mass compile
ILE......Debug view........: *SOURCE goes to *STMT after mass compile.
Just curious is this normal or do other change management do better?
Free Guide: Managing storage for virtual environments
Complete a brief survey to get a complimentary 70-page whitepaper featuring the best methods and solutions for your virtual environment, as well as hypervisor-specific management advice from TechTarget experts. Don’t miss out on this exclusive content!