<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Get the user certificates with the API</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/get-the-user-certificates-with-the-api/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/get-the-user-certificates-with-the-api/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:51:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: tomliotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/get-the-user-certificates-with-the-api/#comment-93799</link>
		<dc:creator>tomliotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 03:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-93799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The QSYSINC example typedef struct has a comment in place of an actual definition of a Pair_Disp[] array. IBM doesn&#039;t know how many elements you will need.

After Qsy_Sel_Ctrl_T in that source member is another typedef struct for Qsy_Sel_Ctrl_Pair_T -- and as you&#039;ll see, it also has a comment in place of Value[] because again it&#039;ll be your decision how to assign each Selection value. The values can all be different lengths.

You will probably build the complete structure in memory by setting through it with a pointer. The beginning will be based on Qsy_Sel_Ctrl_T. Next will come a series of structures based on Qsy_Sel_Ctrl_Pair_T. Each one of those will have a Value[] value. Since each Value[] array will probably be a different length, each Qsy_Sel_Ctrl_Pair_T structure will start at a variable offset from the one before.

Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The QSYSINC example typedef struct has a comment in place of an actual definition of a Pair_Disp[] array. IBM doesn&#8217;t know how many elements you will need.</p>
<p>After Qsy_Sel_Ctrl_T in that source member is another typedef struct for Qsy_Sel_Ctrl_Pair_T &#8212; and as you&#8217;ll see, it also has a comment in place of Value[] because again it&#8217;ll be your decision how to assign each Selection value. The values can all be different lengths.</p>
<p>You will probably build the complete structure in memory by setting through it with a pointer. The beginning will be based on Qsy_Sel_Ctrl_T. Next will come a series of structures based on Qsy_Sel_Ctrl_Pair_T. Each one of those will have a Value[] value. Since each Value[] array will probably be a different length, each Qsy_Sel_Ctrl_Pair_T structure will start at a variable offset from the one before.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gracep</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/get-the-user-certificates-with-the-api/#comment-93781</link>
		<dc:creator>gracep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-93781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HI , it is installed and I can to see the description of Qsy_Sel_Ctrl_T in the QSYDIGID member :) 
thanks a lot. :) .

I have additional question, in this structure is not represented the Qsy_Sel_Ctrl_Pair_T , how we add this selection pairs to our selection control ? or I missing something ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI , it is installed and I can to see the description of Qsy_Sel_Ctrl_T in the QSYDIGID member <img src='http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
thanks a lot. <img src='http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  .</p>
<p>I have additional question, in this structure is not represented the Qsy_Sel_Ctrl_Pair_T , how we add this selection pairs to our selection control ? or I missing something ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomliotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/get-the-user-certificates-with-the-api/#comment-93766</link>
		<dc:creator>tomliotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 06:07:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-93766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To define the selection control, you should look first to the QSYSINC library that should be installed on your system. Look first at member QSYLSTUC in source file H. From there, you should see a reference to Qsy_Sel_Ctrl_T, and you can see a description of that in member QSYDIGID in the same source file.

If QSYSINC is not installed, see if you can get it installed. It is a no-charge option that provides basic prototypes for most APIs.

If you can&#039;t get it installed, post back and we&#039;ll see if the appropriate parts can be posted.

Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To define the selection control, you should look first to the QSYSINC library that should be installed on your system. Look first at member QSYLSTUC in source file H. From there, you should see a reference to Qsy_Sel_Ctrl_T, and you can see a description of that in member QSYDIGID in the same source file.</p>
<p>If QSYSINC is not installed, see if you can get it installed. It is a no-charge option that provides basic prototypes for most APIs.</p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t get it installed, post back and we&#8217;ll see if the appropriate parts can be posted.</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.037 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 300/309 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-06-20 08:51:30 -->