 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Execute a view/query is slower in SQL Server 2005 than 2000</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/execute-a-viewquery-is-slower-in-2005-than-2000/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/execute-a-viewquery-is-slower-in-2005-than-2000/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 10:51:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: mrdenny</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/execute-a-viewquery-is-slower-in-2005-than-2000/#comment-63057</link>
		<dc:creator>mrdenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 20:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-63057</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The number of processors would only effect things if you were using more than one CPU to perform the query.

The first place to start will be the execution plan of the query.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The number of processors would only effect things if you were using more than one CPU to perform the query.</p>
<p>The first place to start will be the execution plan of the query.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: db23</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/execute-a-viewquery-is-slower-in-2005-than-2000/#comment-62971</link>
		<dc:creator>db23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 01:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-62971</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am using SP 3, could it be the number of processors??????]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using SP 3, could it be the number of processors??????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/8 queries in 0.036 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 282/283 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-21 11:40:51 -->