 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exchange Upgrade 2000-2003</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exchange-upgrade-2000-2003/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exchange-upgrade-2000-2003/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:38:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: wrobinson</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exchange-upgrade-2000-2003/#comment-50669</link>
		<dc:creator>wrobinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 06:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-50669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Try logging in to some of the mailboxes then see if they appear in ESM.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try logging in to some of the mailboxes then see if they appear in ESM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pdmeat</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exchange-upgrade-2000-2003/#comment-46541</link>
		<dc:creator>pdmeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-46541</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You don&#039;t need exchange on the test server. Just remove exchange and leave it as an SMTP server forwarding all mail for the internal domain to the new server IP.

Exchange 2000-2003 upgrades are easy. I recommend the mailbox move method mysel. I&#039;ve never had a mb move to an upgraded server cause a problem yet (knock on wood).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t need exchange on the test server. Just remove exchange and leave it as an SMTP server forwarding all mail for the internal domain to the new server IP.</p>
<p>Exchange 2000-2003 upgrades are easy. I recommend the mailbox move method mysel. I&#8217;ve never had a mb move to an upgraded server cause a problem yet (knock on wood).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: windowsjedi</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exchange-upgrade-2000-2003/#comment-46542</link>
		<dc:creator>windowsjedi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 23:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-46542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What should have been done.
Exchange heavily uses DNS for service location and message delivery, so as long as you&#039;ve updated the DNS records (along with any HOSTS file entries that you might have used to eliminate the need for WINS) for the servers you&#039;re moving, you should be fine. By default, all the virtual servers should use the All unassigned setting, which means that they&#039;ll automatically pick up the new addresses. If you&#039;ve assigned specific IP addresses to any of your virtual servers, you&#039;ll need to update those addresses, too.

If you&#039;re using clustering, the answer is slightly different. In a cluster, you must update three items: the cluster&#039;s IP address resources, the IP addresses assigned to the virtual servers, and the IP addresses assigned to the physical cluster nodes. . . . 

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What should have been done.<br />
Exchange heavily uses DNS for service location and message delivery, so as long as you&#8217;ve updated the DNS records (along with any HOSTS file entries that you might have used to eliminate the need for WINS) for the servers you&#8217;re moving, you should be fine. By default, all the virtual servers should use the All unassigned setting, which means that they&#8217;ll automatically pick up the new addresses. If you&#8217;ve assigned specific IP addresses to any of your virtual servers, you&#8217;ll need to update those addresses, too.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re using clustering, the answer is slightly different. In a cluster, you must update three items: the cluster&#8217;s IP address resources, the IP addresses assigned to the virtual servers, and the IP addresses assigned to the physical cluster nodes. . . . </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmweber</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exchange-upgrade-2000-2003/#comment-46543</link>
		<dc:creator>jmweber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 15:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-46543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Make a group, make it a distribution list. 
Add all your users to it.
Send the group a message.

Exchange RUS won&#039;t actually make the mail box unless there is a reason to do so.

John]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Make a group, make it a distribution list.<br />
Add all your users to it.<br />
Send the group a message.</p>
<p>Exchange RUS won&#8217;t actually make the mail box unless there is a reason to do so.</p>
<p>John</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.014 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 310/313 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-24 04:05:54 -->