 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exchange Server 2003 &amp; Missing MX Record</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exchange-server-2003-missing-mx-record/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exchange-server-2003-missing-mx-record/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 16:47:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: 8087873541</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exchange-server-2003-missing-mx-record/#comment-78155</link>
		<dc:creator>8087873541</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 02:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-78155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i have register my domain also made dns entry with isp. my domain is vmail.vyommail.com but when i send mail from nitin@vyommail.com to other domain like yahoo or gmail then it works. but when i send mail from other domain to my domain that time it not works. i get an error Sorry, I couldn&#039;t find a mail exchanger or IP address. (#5.4.4). so pls. help me out in this issue. - thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have register my domain also made dns entry with isp. my domain is vmail.vyommail.com but when i send mail from <a href="mailto:nitin@vyommail.com">nitin@vyommail.com</a> to other domain like yahoo or gmail then it works. but when i send mail from other domain to my domain that time it not works. i get an error Sorry, I couldn&#8217;t find a mail exchanger or IP address. (#5.4.4). so pls. help me out in this issue. &#8211; thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobkberg</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exchange-server-2003-missing-mx-record/#comment-39873</link>
		<dc:creator>bobkberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 17:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-39873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, you can use what astronomer suggested - it gets the same info I used, but I&#039;m an old command-line hacker.

As for what I did and how I got it, I went into nslookup from the command-line (DOS Prompt).

Once inside nslookup, I get reminded of what my current name server is.
===================
Default Server:  manzanita.networkeval.com
Address:  192.168.249.24

&gt;
===================

At this point, I can set specific query types

set type=A (The default - looks up A records)
set type=MX (Look up MX records for a domain in the following queries)
set type=SOA (Start Of Authority - who is responsible for the queried domains)
set type=NS (Name Servers - tell me what the authoritative name servers are).

The structure of the name service records are fairly strict.  The specific syntax varies according to whose name server you&#039;re running (BIND 4, BIND 8, BIND 9, Microsoft, Cisco Network Registrar, etc.), but the information provided over the network to querying systems is always provided in the same format.  I would guess that with all the misconfiguration in your records, you may have even gotten misleading error messages from other systems.  The other thing is that you have to know what you&#039;re looking for - hence my recommendation of the DNS and BIND book.

Hope that helps,

Bob
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you can use what astronomer suggested &#8211; it gets the same info I used, but I&#8217;m an old command-line hacker.</p>
<p>As for what I did and how I got it, I went into nslookup from the command-line (DOS Prompt).</p>
<p>Once inside nslookup, I get reminded of what my current name server is.<br />
===================<br />
Default Server:  manzanita.networkeval.com<br />
Address:  192.168.249.24</p>
<p>&gt;<br />
===================</p>
<p>At this point, I can set specific query types</p>
<p>set type=A (The default &#8211; looks up A records)<br />
set type=MX (Look up MX records for a domain in the following queries)<br />
set type=SOA (Start Of Authority &#8211; who is responsible for the queried domains)<br />
set type=NS (Name Servers &#8211; tell me what the authoritative name servers are).</p>
<p>The structure of the name service records are fairly strict.  The specific syntax varies according to whose name server you&#8217;re running (BIND 4, BIND 8, BIND 9, Microsoft, Cisco Network Registrar, etc.), but the information provided over the network to querying systems is always provided in the same format.  I would guess that with all the misconfiguration in your records, you may have even gotten misleading error messages from other systems.  The other thing is that you have to know what you&#8217;re looking for &#8211; hence my recommendation of the DNS and BIND book.</p>
<p>Hope that helps,</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: astronomer</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exchange-server-2003-missing-mx-record/#comment-39874</link>
		<dc:creator>astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 15:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-39874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you try the site I recommended? You can get most of this information from this site and see how things look from the outside. Check out the down arrow on the query line. You should be able to find everything you need. When I set up our public DNS servers I used this technique to verify everything was correct from an outside perspective.
rt]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you try the site I recommended? You can get most of this information from this site and see how things look from the outside. Check out the down arrow on the query line. You should be able to find everything you need. When I set up our public DNS servers I used this technique to verify everything was correct from an outside perspective.<br />
rt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pmiller78</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exchange-server-2003-missing-mx-record/#comment-39875</link>
		<dc:creator>pmiller78</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 13:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-39875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Bob,
THanks for the info, that is very helpful. I do have another question for you though; What were youusing to get those results? I would like to see if they are any better now that some changes have been made and what you posted was alot more useful that anything else I have found so far.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bob,<br />
THanks for the info, that is very helpful. I do have another question for you though; What were youusing to get those results? I would like to see if they are any better now that some changes have been made and what you posted was alot more useful that anything else I have found so far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bobkberg</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exchange-server-2003-missing-mx-record/#comment-39876</link>
		<dc:creator>bobkberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 12:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-39876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you&#039;re missing a key point here.  Your (external) DNS records are not properly set up.

When you look up the SOA for msimm.com, you get:
Non-authoritative answer:
msimm.com
        primary name server = webserver
        responsible mail addr = admin
        serial  = 319673
        refresh = 900 (15 mins)
        retry   = 600 (10 mins)
        expire  = 86400 (1 day)
        default TTL = 3600 (1 hour)
&gt; set type=ns

Using Yahoo.com as an example, you get:
yahoo.com
        primary name server = ns1.yahoo.com
        responsible mail addr = hostmaster.yahoo-inc.com
        serial  = 2007060707
        refresh = 3600 (1 hour)
        retry   = 300 (5 mins)
        expire  = 1814400 (21 days)
        default TTL = 600 (10 mins)

Your external msimm.com SOA record does not contain a complete name server, the responsible mail address, has an incomplete email (just &quot;admin&quot;).

Depending on which name server I use, when I do an NS (Set type=ns), I get the following for your name server records:
&gt; msimm.com
Server:  vnsc-bak.sys.gtei.net
Address:  4.2.2.2

DNS request timed out.
    timeout was 2 seconds.
Non-authoritative answer:
msimm.com       nameserver = webserver

== OR ==

&gt; msimm.com
Server:  primitivo.networkeval.com
Address:  192.168.249.20

Non-authoritative answer:
msimm.com       nameserver = ns1.msimm.com
msimm.com       nameserver = ns.msimm.com

But the latter names do NOT resolve.

Bottom Line: I could keep digging, but the key point here is that whoever is maintaining your external DNS has done more things wrong than I care to discover.   I&#039;d bet large sums of money that I could find even more if I kept going.

Recommendation: Buy a copy of DNS and BIND (Paul Albitz and Cricket Liu) O&#039;Reilly ISBN: 0-596-00158-4, and read the chapters on setting up domains to begin with.  Then make your ISP people read it.  :-).  Even if you&#039;re using a non-BIND DNS like Microsoft&#039;s or Cisco&#039;s Network Registrar, the data structure is the same.

Alternately, go back to your previous ISP, since they seemed to know what they were doing, DNS-wise.

Bob

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re missing a key point here.  Your (external) DNS records are not properly set up.</p>
<p>When you look up the SOA for msimm.com, you get:<br />
Non-authoritative answer:<br />
msimm.com<br />
        primary name server = webserver<br />
        responsible mail addr = admin<br />
        serial  = 319673<br />
        refresh = 900 (15 mins)<br />
        retry   = 600 (10 mins)<br />
        expire  = 86400 (1 day)<br />
        default TTL = 3600 (1 hour)<br />
&gt; set type=ns</p>
<p>Using Yahoo.com as an example, you get:<br />
yahoo.com<br />
        primary name server = ns1.yahoo.com<br />
        responsible mail addr = hostmaster.yahoo-inc.com<br />
        serial  = 2007060707<br />
        refresh = 3600 (1 hour)<br />
        retry   = 300 (5 mins)<br />
        expire  = 1814400 (21 days)<br />
        default TTL = 600 (10 mins)</p>
<p>Your external msimm.com SOA record does not contain a complete name server, the responsible mail address, has an incomplete email (just &#8220;admin&#8221;).</p>
<p>Depending on which name server I use, when I do an NS (Set type=ns), I get the following for your name server records:<br />
&gt; msimm.com<br />
Server:  vnsc-bak.sys.gtei.net<br />
Address:  4.2.2.2</p>
<p>DNS request timed out.<br />
    timeout was 2 seconds.<br />
Non-authoritative answer:<br />
msimm.com       nameserver = webserver</p>
<p>== OR ==</p>
<p>&gt; msimm.com<br />
Server:  primitivo.networkeval.com<br />
Address:  192.168.249.20</p>
<p>Non-authoritative answer:<br />
msimm.com       nameserver = ns1.msimm.com<br />
msimm.com       nameserver = ns.msimm.com</p>
<p>But the latter names do NOT resolve.</p>
<p>Bottom Line: I could keep digging, but the key point here is that whoever is maintaining your external DNS has done more things wrong than I care to discover.   I&#8217;d bet large sums of money that I could find even more if I kept going.</p>
<p>Recommendation: Buy a copy of DNS and BIND (Paul Albitz and Cricket Liu) O&#8217;Reilly ISBN: 0-596-00158-4, and read the chapters on setting up domains to begin with.  Then make your ISP people read it.  <img src='http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .  Even if you&#8217;re using a non-BIND DNS like Microsoft&#8217;s or Cisco&#8217;s Network Registrar, the data structure is the same.</p>
<p>Alternately, go back to your previous ISP, since they seemed to know what they were doing, DNS-wise.</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pmiller78</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exchange-server-2003-missing-mx-record/#comment-39877</link>
		<dc:creator>pmiller78</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 10:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-39877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well.. the records are all there as they were before the ISP change. And the DNS should be pointing to 74.62.65.70.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well.. the records are all there as they were before the ISP change. And the DNS should be pointing to 74.62.65.70.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: astronomer</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exchange-server-2003-missing-mx-record/#comment-39878</link>
		<dc:creator>astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-39878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think Bob is right about the PTR. I did a reverse lookup and got rrcs-74-62-65-70.west.biz.rr.com
This doesn&#039;t look anything like your domain.
If you want to do your own testing from outside, there are some sites for this purpose. Here is one of them: http://www.kloth.net/services/nslookup.php
Hope this helps.
rt]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Bob is right about the PTR. I did a reverse lookup and got rrcs-74-62-65-70.west.biz.rr.com<br />
This doesn&#8217;t look anything like your domain.<br />
If you want to do your own testing from outside, there are some sites for this purpose. Here is one of them: <a href="http://www.kloth.net/services/nslookup.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.kloth.net/services/nslookup.php</a><br />
Hope this helps.<br />
rt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pmiller78</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exchange-server-2003-missing-mx-record/#comment-39879</link>
		<dc:creator>pmiller78</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-39879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am running my own DNS server here in the office. I have my SOA and MX records listed. They have not changed. I did make a change from one ISP to another last week, you&#039;d think the DNS propogation would be done by now but I guess that is a possibility. Can some of you try a nslookup on it for me and let me know what you get? mail.msimm.com should come to 74.62.65.70]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am running my own DNS server here in the office. I have my SOA and MX records listed. They have not changed. I did make a change from one ISP to another last week, you&#8217;d think the DNS propogation would be done by now but I guess that is a possibility. Can some of you try a nslookup on it for me and let me know what you get? mail.msimm.com should come to 74.62.65.70</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.016 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 370/373 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-20 16:54:40 -->