 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exchange 2003 e-mail challenges</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exchange-2003-e-mail-challenges/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exchange-2003-e-mail-challenges/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: fiberpro</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exchange-2003-e-mail-challenges/#comment-52209</link>
		<dc:creator>fiberpro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 04:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-52209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been researching the issue.  SP2 was installed upon implementation and I have found the issue.  In Windows Vista certain systems do not have Dynamic HTML installed with IE 7.  The solution is to apply Dynamic HTML updates to the server so that Vista will run the components “server-side” instead of on the client-computer.  Does that sound right?

Anyway, I did try another browser (Firefox) and had no problems sending e-mails or doing anything in the web based exchange.   I will try the dynamic html fix or update on the server in this coming week.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been researching the issue.  SP2 was installed upon implementation and I have found the issue.  In Windows Vista certain systems do not have Dynamic HTML installed with IE 7.  The solution is to apply Dynamic HTML updates to the server so that Vista will run the components “server-side” instead of on the client-computer.  Does that sound right?</p>
<p>Anyway, I did try another browser (Firefox) and had no problems sending e-mails or doing anything in the web based exchange.   I will try the dynamic html fix or update on the server in this coming week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nevyn357</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exchange-2003-e-mail-challenges/#comment-52208</link>
		<dc:creator>nevyn357</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 01:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-52208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You could also try using a different browser.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could also try using a different browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fiberpro</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exchange-2003-e-mail-challenges/#comment-52207</link>
		<dc:creator>fiberpro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:06:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-52207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I won&#039;t be able to try this solution until I get back in the office next week.  Thanks for the suggestion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t be able to try this solution until I get back in the office next week.  Thanks for the suggestion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotcarl</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exchange-2003-e-mail-challenges/#comment-52201</link>
		<dc:creator>hotcarl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 21:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-52201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[install exchange 2003 service pack 2 on your mail server]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>install exchange 2003 service pack 2 on your mail server</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.040 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 309/315 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-24 15:50:17 -->