<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exch5.5 to E2K upgrade problem &#8211; moving mailboxes &#8211; migration.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exch55-to-e2k-upgrade-problem-moving-mailboxes-migration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exch55-to-e2k-upgrade-problem-moving-mailboxes-migration/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:10:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: lajollaitguy</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exch55-to-e2k-upgrade-problem-moving-mailboxes-migration/#comment-43561</link>
		<dc:creator>lajollaitguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 11:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-43561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I might have a connection agreement issue (along with so many other issue).  In my active directory Connection Manager I only see &quot;Config CA_MyDomainName_E2KSeverName&quot; andits Windows server is E5.5Server, its Exchange Server is E2KServer and its Active Directory is also E2KServer.
Is this right? Shouldn&#039;t the AD Server still be the old E5.5 Server? Also, going into its properties I have the following tabs: From Exchange, From Windows, Details, General, Connections and Schedule.  Shouldn&#039;t there be an advanced tab?  According to MS I need to &quot;Click the Advanced tab, and then click to select the This is a primary Connection Agreement for the connected Exchange Organization check box (if it is not already selected)&quot;
I don&#039;t have the advanced tab! Does this apply to only Exchange 2003? 
Help is greatly appreciated!!
 ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might have a connection agreement issue (along with so many other issue).  In my active directory Connection Manager I only see &#8220;Config CA_MyDomainName_E2KSeverName&#8221; andits Windows server is E5.5Server, its Exchange Server is E2KServer and its Active Directory is also E2KServer.<br />
Is this right? Shouldn&#8217;t the AD Server still be the old E5.5 Server? Also, going into its properties I have the following tabs: From Exchange, From Windows, Details, General, Connections and Schedule.  Shouldn&#8217;t there be an advanced tab?  According to MS I need to &#8220;Click the Advanced tab, and then click to select the This is a primary Connection Agreement for the connected Exchange Organization check box (if it is not already selected)&#8221;<br />
I don&#8217;t have the advanced tab! Does this apply to only Exchange 2003?<br />
Help is greatly appreciated!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lajollaitguy</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exch55-to-e2k-upgrade-problem-moving-mailboxes-migration/#comment-43562</link>
		<dc:creator>lajollaitguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 11:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-43562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enterprize.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enterprize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjuliannc</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exch55-to-e2k-upgrade-problem-moving-mailboxes-migration/#comment-43563</link>
		<dc:creator>jjuliannc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 11:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-43563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this Exchange 2000 &quot;Standard&quot; or &quot;Enterprise&quot;?


Aideme]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this Exchange 2000 &#8220;Standard&#8221; or &#8220;Enterprise&#8221;?</p>
<p>Aideme</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lajollaitguy</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exch55-to-e2k-upgrade-problem-moving-mailboxes-migration/#comment-43564</link>
		<dc:creator>lajollaitguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 10:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-43564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I did look at this but didn&#039;t work for me.
I tried it again anyway but still no luck.
Any thing else I should look at? Running out of ideas.
If I were to do this manually (backup mailboxes using client, restoring them on E2K, how much of a pain/business continuity disruption  will there be?  Any other options?  I have to get this done in the next 7 days.  I have 50 mailboxes, tons of distribution lists and about 20 GB of Information Store.
Any help is appreciated!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did look at this but didn&#8217;t work for me.<br />
I tried it again anyway but still no luck.<br />
Any thing else I should look at? Running out of ideas.<br />
If I were to do this manually (backup mailboxes using client, restoring them on E2K, how much of a pain/business continuity disruption  will there be?  Any other options?  I have to get this done in the next 7 days.  I have 50 mailboxes, tons of distribution lists and about 20 GB of Information Store.<br />
Any help is appreciated!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjuliannc</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exch55-to-e2k-upgrade-problem-moving-mailboxes-migration/#comment-43565</link>
		<dc:creator>jjuliannc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 18:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-43565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take a look at this kb article http://support.microsoft.com/kb/827618/en-us

The similarities in symptoms, not necessarily error codes  even as the articles indicates.


Aideme]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at this kb article <a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/827618/en-us" rel="nofollow">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/827618/en-us</a></p>
<p>The similarities in symptoms, not necessarily error codes  even as the articles indicates.</p>
<p>Aideme</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjuliannc</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exch55-to-e2k-upgrade-problem-moving-mailboxes-migration/#comment-43567</link>
		<dc:creator>jjuliannc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 11:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-43567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everything looks fine, how about the DCDIAG log?


Aideme]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything looks fine, how about the DCDIAG log?</p>
<p>Aideme</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lajollaitguy</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exch55-to-e2k-upgrade-problem-moving-mailboxes-migration/#comment-43569</link>
		<dc:creator>lajollaitguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 10:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-43569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now we see a problem, any suggestions as to where should I start and what steps should I take.
Help is greatly appreciated.
Thanx!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now we see a problem, any suggestions as to where should I start and what steps should I take.<br />
Help is greatly appreciated.<br />
Thanx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjuliannc</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exch55-to-e2k-upgrade-problem-moving-mailboxes-migration/#comment-43570</link>
		<dc:creator>jjuliannc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 18:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-43570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Always good to see a failure that makes sense.  Let me know what you find...


Aideme]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Always good to see a failure that makes sense.  Let me know what you find&#8230;</p>
<p>Aideme</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjuliannc</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exch55-to-e2k-upgrade-problem-moving-mailboxes-migration/#comment-43574</link>
		<dc:creator>jjuliannc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 16:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-43574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Run  netdiag /test:dsgetdc /d:yourdomainname.com /v   and pipe to text file.


This is a good one.  The FRS errors suggest communications and/or permissions issues.  Hopefully the netdiag explains the problem.


Aideme]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Run  netdiag /test:dsgetdc /d:yourdomainname.com /v   and pipe to text file.</p>
<p>This is a good one.  The FRS errors suggest communications and/or permissions issues.  Hopefully the netdiag explains the problem.</p>
<p>Aideme</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjuliannc</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/exch55-to-e2k-upgrade-problem-moving-mailboxes-migration/#comment-43576</link>
		<dc:creator>jjuliannc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 10:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-43576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Run Netdiag /fix and DCDIAG /v on the E2K server and pipe output to a file.

Forgetting about the Exchange for a moment, can you administer accounts from the E2K server?


Aideme]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Run Netdiag /fix and DCDIAG /v on the E2K server and pipe output to a file.</p>
<p>Forgetting about the Exchange for a moment, can you administer accounts from the E2K server?</p>
<p>Aideme</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.032 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 393/399 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-06-19 14:13:23 -->