 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ethernet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/ethernet-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/ethernet-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:24:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: bobkberg</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/ethernet-2/#comment-43276</link>
		<dc:creator>bobkberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2005 22:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-43276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok, let&#039;s look at this a little differently.

As Howard2nd pointed out, you&#039;ve not specified which of several &quot;ethernet&quot; specifications you&#039;ve based your efforts on.  802.3, 10BaseT or what?

Assuming 802.3...
1) Do you have the preamble in place? (7 bytes of 10101010)
2) Are you using basic or differential Manchester encoding?
3) Do you have the &quot;Start of Frame&quot; byte in place?
4) Are your frames at least 64 bytes long?
5) If not, have you padded them out to that minimum length?
6) What is the range of the packet being used to calculate the checksum?
7) Have you used an oscilloscope to verify presence or absence of electrical noise on the wire which could render the checksum invalid due to corruption of data bits?

Bob
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, let&#8217;s look at this a little differently.</p>
<p>As Howard2nd pointed out, you&#8217;ve not specified which of several &#8220;ethernet&#8221; specifications you&#8217;ve based your efforts on.  802.3, 10BaseT or what?</p>
<p>Assuming 802.3&#8230;<br />
1) Do you have the preamble in place? (7 bytes of 10101010)<br />
2) Are you using basic or differential Manchester encoding?<br />
3) Do you have the &#8220;Start of Frame&#8221; byte in place?<br />
4) Are your frames at least 64 bytes long?<br />
5) If not, have you padded them out to that minimum length?<br />
6) What is the range of the packet being used to calculate the checksum?<br />
7) Have you used an oscilloscope to verify presence or absence of electrical noise on the wire which could render the checksum invalid due to corruption of data bits?</p>
<p>Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larrythethird</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/ethernet-2/#comment-43277</link>
		<dc:creator>larrythethird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2005 13:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-43277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The MAC address IS the layer one.  Without it, there is no way to find it on a network.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The MAC address IS the layer one.  Without it, there is no way to find it on a network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: larrythethird</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/ethernet-2/#comment-43278</link>
		<dc:creator>larrythethird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2005 13:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-43278</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The NAC address IS the layer one.  Without it, there is no way to find it on a network.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NAC address IS the layer one.  Without it, there is no way to find it on a network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.015 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 296/299 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-25 04:07:54 -->