 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DST problems coming back.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dst-problems-coming-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dst-problems-coming-back/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 03:14:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: technochic</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dst-problems-coming-back/#comment-52489</link>
		<dc:creator>technochic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-52489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also keep in mind that even after the exchange servers and client PC&#039;s have been patched, you still have to run the microsoft outlook calendar update tool. If everyone is still off after an hour then I think you still need to run either the exchange calendar update tool or the outlook client calendar update tool.

It depends on how many users need to be updated as to which you might choose to run.

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/930879

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=e343a233-b9c8-4652-9dd8-ae0f1af62568&amp;displaylang=en]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also keep in mind that even after the exchange servers and client PC&#8217;s have been patched, you still have to run the microsoft outlook calendar update tool. If everyone is still off after an hour then I think you still need to run either the exchange calendar update tool or the outlook client calendar update tool.</p>
<p>It depends on how many users need to be updated as to which you might choose to run.</p>
<p><a href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/930879" rel="nofollow">http://support.microsoft.com/kb/930879</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=e343a233-b9c8-4652-9dd8-ae0f1af62568&#038;displaylang=en" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=e343a233-b9c8-4652-9dd8-ae0f1af62568&#038;displaylang=en</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpciocon</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dst-problems-coming-back/#comment-52245</link>
		<dc:creator>jpciocon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 17:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-52245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear EastCoastGuy:

I have seen this in recurring meetings that were originally scheduled by colleagues outside of the USA.  Those meetings now show up 1 hour ahead because of the DST time change, however, it doesn&#039;t matter much because the meeting times are still good.

I agree that last year&#039;s go-around with Microsoft and the DST Patch should have resolved all issues.  Perhaps the timezone is off on those that are having problems?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear EastCoastGuy:</p>
<p>I have seen this in recurring meetings that were originally scheduled by colleagues outside of the USA.  Those meetings now show up 1 hour ahead because of the DST time change, however, it doesn&#8217;t matter much because the meeting times are still good.</p>
<p>I agree that last year&#8217;s go-around with Microsoft and the DST Patch should have resolved all issues.  Perhaps the timezone is off on those that are having problems?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.012 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 282/285 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-19 21:58:09 -->