 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Domino document/entry collection limit?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/domino-documententry-collection-limit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/domino-documententry-collection-limit/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 18:24:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: brooklynegg</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/domino-documententry-collection-limit/#comment-61098</link>
		<dc:creator>brooklynegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-61098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no problem with looping very, very large collections. The problem that may have been refered to is GetNthDocument. That method is inappropriate for looping.   I don&#039;t even know when GetNthDocument would be appropriate to use.  I supposed if you knew that a collection was ordered a certain way and you wanted to get the 50,000th document in the collection, then it would be appropriate. But there would probably be a more efficient way to do that (documentbykey in a view, or something).

&lt;b&gt;From Help:&lt;/b&gt; Using GetNthDocument to iterate through a loop is strongly discouraged for performance reasons. See GetDocument, GetFirstDocument, GetLastDocument, GetNextDocument, and GetPrevDocument for the preferred loop structure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no problem with looping very, very large collections. The problem that may have been refered to is GetNthDocument. That method is inappropriate for looping.   I don&#8217;t even know when GetNthDocument would be appropriate to use.  I supposed if you knew that a collection was ordered a certain way and you wanted to get the 50,000th document in the collection, then it would be appropriate. But there would probably be a more efficient way to do that (documentbykey in a view, or something).</p>
<p><b>From Help:</b> Using GetNthDocument to iterate through a loop is strongly discouraged for performance reasons. See GetDocument, GetFirstDocument, GetLastDocument, GetNextDocument, and GetPrevDocument for the preferred loop structure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brucewayne</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/domino-documententry-collection-limit/#comment-61097</link>
		<dc:creator>brucewayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-61097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[are you talking about NotesDocumentCollection greater &gt; 1000 documents ?
I never  had any problems with that, even in Domino 7 !

But if it would be the case, i suggest you use the NotesViewEntryCollection, wich is a better way for a memory performance point of view and avoid Get]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>are you talking about NotesDocumentCollection greater &gt; 1000 documents ?<br />
I never  had any problems with that, even in Domino 7 !</p>
<p>But if it would be the case, i suggest you use the NotesViewEntryCollection, wich is a better way for a memory performance point of view and avoid Get</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.037 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 281/287 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-23 18:58:55 -->