 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Domain.local versus domain.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/domainlocal-versus-domaincom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/domainlocal-versus-domaincom/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 23:02:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: bobkberg</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/domainlocal-versus-domaincom/#comment-48173</link>
		<dc:creator>bobkberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2004 14:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-48173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As dwiebesick already pointed out, you&#039;re talking about namespace, and not real security per se.

That said, the domain.local would be favored &quot;slightly&quot; simply because it cannot be propagated elsewhere on the internet.  But the same can be done with domain.com, and is commonly handled that way - I maintain an inside DNS server with my domain.com which has NO connection whatever with the external one version of my domain.com, so they&#039;re equally secure in that respect.

However, if you&#039;re using the same physical server for both inside and outside Name Service, you&#039;re looking for trouble anyway.  

My $.02
Bob
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As dwiebesick already pointed out, you&#8217;re talking about namespace, and not real security per se.</p>
<p>That said, the domain.local would be favored &#8220;slightly&#8221; simply because it cannot be propagated elsewhere on the internet.  But the same can be done with domain.com, and is commonly handled that way &#8211; I maintain an inside DNS server with my domain.com which has NO connection whatever with the external one version of my domain.com, so they&#8217;re equally secure in that respect.</p>
<p>However, if you&#8217;re using the same physical server for both inside and outside Name Service, you&#8217;re looking for trouble anyway.  </p>
<p>My $.02<br />
Bob</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.041 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 267/273 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-25 23:05:35 -->