Does virtualization apply to blade servers?

820 pts.
Tags:
Blade servers
Virtualization
Are IT organizations virtualizing blade servers or do you need a more powerful server than Blade servers? Jim
ASKED: November 5, 2008  7:23 PM
UPDATED: December 22, 2008  3:43 PM

Answer Wiki

Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.

Absolutely!!!

VMWare’s ESXi product is a perfect fit for blade servers and, given that most blade solutions can boot from SAN, it makes sense to use a blade center as a large ESX cluster. Remember, in aggregate, a VMWare cluster is more powerful than a single server, especially if you use Resource Groups coupled with Dynamic Resource Scheduling (DRS) and VMotion. ;)

I design systems around this all the time.

cheers,

Dave

VMware will work in the blade infrastructure, the reality is as you start to implement more VMware features and functions in the architecture, you may run out of I/O room in any Blade Implementation.

Let’s take for example the Ethernet Architecture. If you are still doing traditional backups with agents, the VMware server will need to have it’s onw ether channel to do that on as you don;t want to step on your user network. You also need 2 ether channels for your managment infrastructure, You also need 2 to 4 ether channels for your user traffic, you will need another etherchannel for FT when it becomes available. So as you can see we are at about 6 to 8 etherchannels. This means 6 to 8 Ethenet switches in one blade chassis. Now since you need all of these networks to be VMotion aware, you will also need to manage those switches.

You next worry on a blade chassis is the amount of supported RAM.

Depending how large your environment and what kind of network management infrasturcture you have, the BladeChassis may not be a best fit. If you have 20-100 servers to virtualize, I think that blades may be a good case for you, but if it is larger I would suggest another route.

Now if you put your VMware on an x3850M2 with 24 cores and 32 available RAM slots (before you scale this server into an x3950M2) then your I/O and memory choices are limitless compared to a blade architecture.

Just my 2 cents.

Discuss This Question: 1  Reply

 
There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.
Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.
Send me notifications when members answer or reply to this question.

REGISTER or login:

Forgot Password?
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy
  • Neth
    Blades are a great solution. We're currently running on blades with 2 dual-core Xeons with 24GB RAM and are running as many as 24 VMs on a single host. New hosts will be 2 quad-core Xeons with 48GB RAM. I think if you go any more than 8 cores/host, you run the risk of not having enough hosts to support your environment in the case of a host failure.
    10 pointsBadges:
    report

Forgot Password

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an e-mail containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

To follow this tag...

There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.

REGISTER or login:

Forgot Password?
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Thanks! We'll email you when relevant content is added and updated.

Following