<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does the Cisco Linksys RVS4000 VPN support AES-256?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/does-the-cisco-linksys-rvs4000-vpn-support-aes-256/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/does-the-cisco-linksys-rvs4000-vpn-support-aes-256/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 03:53:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Royal Peight</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/does-the-cisco-linksys-rvs4000-vpn-support-aes-256/#comment-73421</link>
		<dc:creator>Royal Peight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-73421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I felt like I was listening to a friend when I read your story posted on your blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I felt like I was listening to a friend when I read your story posted on your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: copiousk</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/does-the-cisco-linksys-rvs4000-vpn-support-aes-256/#comment-61767</link>
		<dc:creator>copiousk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:05:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-61767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Searching the web I had seen that blog - and it confused me - because on the one hand it suggests that are doing AES-256 ... yet AES-256 is not one of the options in the menu.

It was this blog entry that sent me searching from software updates that might add this feature to the RVS4000.

Does anyone have any other suggestions?

From the blog ...

2.  The setup begins with an https (TLS) authentication protocol, using the router&#039;s PEM certificate for authentication, assuming you have sent that client certificate to whoever is going to be logging on, so they can install it in their install directory.  (Otherwise, they will have to answer &quot;no&quot; to the question of whether to disconnect.  This in turns leaves them vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle hijacking attack.)  This authentication protocol is carried out with AES-256, which is certainly good, but with RSA-1024 and SHA-1, both of which are now deprecated as not being strong enough]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Searching the web I had seen that blog &#8211; and it confused me &#8211; because on the one hand it suggests that are doing AES-256 &#8230; yet AES-256 is not one of the options in the menu.</p>
<p>It was this blog entry that sent me searching from software updates that might add this feature to the RVS4000.</p>
<p>Does anyone have any other suggestions?</p>
<p>From the blog &#8230;</p>
<p>2.  The setup begins with an https (TLS) authentication protocol, using the router&#8217;s PEM certificate for authentication, assuming you have sent that client certificate to whoever is going to be logging on, so they can install it in their install directory.  (Otherwise, they will have to answer &#8220;no&#8221; to the question of whether to disconnect.  This in turns leaves them vulnerable to a man-in-the-middle hijacking attack.)  This authentication protocol is carried out with AES-256, which is certainly good, but with RSA-1024 and SHA-1, both of which are now deprecated as not being strong enough</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.011 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 282/285 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-06-20 04:33:37 -->