 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do we need to compile LF when its PF changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/do-we-need-to-compile-lf-when-its-pf-changes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/do-we-need-to-compile-lf-when-its-pf-changes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:30:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: TomLiotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/do-we-need-to-compile-lf-when-its-pf-changes/#comment-109419</link>
		<dc:creator>TomLiotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 23:49:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/do-we-need-to-compile-lf-when-its-pf-changes/#comment-109419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the format level identifier changes for a file, programs that open the file will need to be recompiled in order to avoid a level check.
&#160;
It doesn&#039;t matter how the file was changed. If a PF was changed with CHGPF and the related LFs received a new level ID, programs that open the LFs will need to be recompiled.
&#160;
Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the format level identifier changes for a file, programs that open the file will need to be recompiled in order to avoid a level check.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
It doesn&#8217;t matter how the file was changed. If a PF was changed with CHGPF and the related LFs received a new level ID, programs that open the LFs will need to be recompiled.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philpl1jb</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/do-we-need-to-compile-lf-when-its-pf-changes/#comment-109417</link>
		<dc:creator>philpl1jb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 21:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/do-we-need-to-compile-lf-when-its-pf-changes/#comment-109417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No .. since you&#039;ve changed the physical file and the logical file structure you want the programs to fail!!!&#160; (what if you made the first field in the file one character wider.....).&#160;
&#160;
&#160;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No .. since you&#8217;ve changed the physical file and the logical file structure you want the programs to fail!!!&nbsp; (what if you made the first field in the file one character wider&#8230;..).&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ToddN2000</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/do-we-need-to-compile-lf-when-its-pf-changes/#comment-109410</link>
		<dc:creator>ToddN2000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 16:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/do-we-need-to-compile-lf-when-its-pf-changes/#comment-109410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thought I learned something new today. Tried the CHGPF command and it worked fine. New fields were in both th PF and LF without having to recompile them. The only problem I found is you still get a level check on the programs using the LF.&#160; 
Is there a way to avoid this with out setting the file to *LVLCHK *NO?
&#160;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought I learned something new today. Tried the CHGPF command and it worked fine. New fields were in both th PF and LF without having to recompile them. The only problem I found is you still get a level check on the programs using the LF.&nbsp;<br />
Is there a way to avoid this with out setting the file to *LVLCHK *NO?<br />
&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philpl1jb</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/do-we-need-to-compile-lf-when-its-pf-changes/#comment-109402</link>
		<dc:creator>philpl1jb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:33:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/do-we-need-to-compile-lf-when-its-pf-changes/#comment-109402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1.&#160; If you used the command CHGPF or SQL ALTER TABLE you will not need to recompile the logicals
&#160;
2.&#160; If the logical has a field list you may want to add the field to the logical and recompile the logical.&#160; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.&nbsp; If you used the command CHGPF or SQL ALTER TABLE you will not need to recompile the logicals<br />
&nbsp;<br />
2.&nbsp; If the logical has a field list you may want to add the field to the logical and recompile the logical.&nbsp; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NeilD</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/do-we-need-to-compile-lf-when-its-pf-changes/#comment-109399</link>
		<dc:creator>NeilD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 09:47:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/do-we-need-to-compile-lf-when-its-pf-changes/#comment-109399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few questions:Have you Compiled the PF?Did you compile the PF in the same library as the dependant LF&#039;s?Basically, in order to compile the PF you will need to delete the LF&#039;s and recompile them after the PF has compiled. The the answer to you wuestion is Yes, you must recompile dependant Lf&#039;s.&#160;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few questions:Have you Compiled the PF?Did you compile the PF in the same library as the dependant LF&#8217;s?Basically, in order to compile the PF you will need to delete the LF&#8217;s and recompile them after the PF has compiled. The the answer to you wuestion is Yes, you must recompile dependant Lf&#8217;s.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.048 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 323/329 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-24 12:38:42 -->