I am needing to know if it is vital i setup the active directory. Using Windows Server 2003 on a server which will be used mainly as a terminal server for users to come into to access only data on this server, be able to access and copy data to their computer and run MS Office 2003. This server does not manage any workstations within the network nor does it manage any other data on any other network drives.
Naturally, i will have to setup security for the users coming in remotely to the server but is active directory necessary?
Software/Hardware used:
ASKED:
January 14, 2009 11:58 PM
UPDATED:
January 15, 2009 10:27 PM
Users do not have accounts in AD anywhere on our network. Does AD give you additional security/restrictions?
AD is very powerful – sometimes too much for its own good (and the sanity of network admins). Yes, you can do thousands of things with security in AD, literally. I had a similar need with a similar type server. I set things up without AD and it’s perfect for what I need. If you don’t have many users now and won’t in the future, I’d say keep it simple with local accounts.