DNS security

pts.
Tags:
DNS attacks
What are most important things to consider to secure DNS server on the Enterprise?

Answer Wiki

Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.

Hi, great question by the way.

Bind based DNS

Best practice design for BIND-based DNS calls for using one primary DNS server and as many secondary DNS servers required to support your environment for each DNS zone.

In this scenario, the primary server for each zone is authoritative and is the only location where updates for a zone can take place. Secondary and tertiary servers and so on, help process the load of DNS queries.

The process by which secondary and tertiary servers are kept up to date is zone transfers. By default — at least on the Microsoft Windows platform, zone transfers are permitted by any server — or anyone for that matter, making a request.

To mitigate this first concern, it is recommended to restrict zone updates to authorized servers only. This is done by adding the IP address of all servers authorized to perform a zone transfers to the authorized servers list for each zone on the primary server. It is also a good idea to configure each zone to notify secondary servers when an update is available to initiate a zone transfer.

Active Directory-Integrated based DNS

Active Directory-Integrated DNS is different from BIND based DNS in that it does not use a primary-secondary method of replication. Instead, each DNS server is for all intents and purposes, ‘primary’. This means that zone updates can be applied at any DNS server responsible for a zone. The changes will then replicate to all remaining DNS servers during the next AD replication cycle.

Something to consider with AD-Integrated DNS is dynamic updates. Dynamic updates allow hosts to update their own host records in DNS. This is a useful feature, however, zones should be configured to allow secure updates only to prevent unauthorized updates.

Dynamic DNS is a common feature today, so this may very well be applicable to other flavors of DNS, not just Microsoft.

There is a great feature called “restricted groups” in AD that allows group membership for built-in and created groups to be managed by group policy. For example, a policy can be created so that there are no members in the DNSAdmins group. When a change needs to be performed, a user account or group can be added to the group; however, the user or group will be removed automatically by group policy during the next replication cycle. This ensures that users and groups are not granted elevated privileges and permissions indefinitely; also from administrators adding themselves to groups.

Good luck and remember to have fun!

Discuss This Question:  

 
There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.
Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.
Send me notifications when members answer or reply to this question.

REGISTER or login:

Forgot Password?
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Forgot Password

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an e-mail containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

To follow this tag...

There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.

REGISTER or login:

Forgot Password?
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Thanks! We'll email you when relevant content is added and updated.

Following