 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DNS PTR records inexplicable appearance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dns-ptr-records-inexplicable-appearance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dns-ptr-records-inexplicable-appearance/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 13:28:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: sonyfreek</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dns-ptr-records-inexplicable-appearance/#comment-41507</link>
		<dc:creator>sonyfreek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-41507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can&#039;t filter by username because it&#039;s never the user that is requesting the DNS dynamic entry.  The computer itself is the one that requests the entry.  However, you could filter your logs based on IP Address, as mentioned in this article: 
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/library/ServerHelp/2a2723c5-3462-411d-94e2-fe5fc08db07b.mspx

Filtering it would allow you to see information from a specific IP Address.  Maybe the information in the debug file will tell you what the computer is requesting.  Since it&#039;s a PTR record that&#039;s being added, you should have the IP Address as well.

SF]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can&#8217;t filter by username because it&#8217;s never the user that is requesting the DNS dynamic entry.  The computer itself is the one that requests the entry.  However, you could filter your logs based on IP Address, as mentioned in this article:<br />
<a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/library/ServerHelp/2a2723c5-3462-411d-94e2-fe5fc08db07b.mspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windowsserver2003/library/ServerHelp/2a2723c5-3462-411d-94e2-fe5fc08db07b.mspx</a></p>
<p>Filtering it would allow you to see information from a specific IP Address.  Maybe the information in the debug file will tell you what the computer is requesting.  Since it&#8217;s a PTR record that&#8217;s being added, you should have the IP Address as well.</p>
<p>SF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: petroleumman</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dns-ptr-records-inexplicable-appearance/#comment-41508</link>
		<dc:creator>petroleumman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-41508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hello,

Does your Linux server have multiple NIC&#039;s? If this is the case check that you don&#039;t have an old IP still assigned to one of the secondary NIC&#039;s. If you do this could be the source of your rouge record in DNS. 

Also, check all of your IP settings on the Linux box for any old IP&#039;s that still may be configured. Just because your box is working on the network does not necessarily mean that an old address is not present somewhere. 

Good Luck!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>Does your Linux server have multiple NIC&#8217;s? If this is the case check that you don&#8217;t have an old IP still assigned to one of the secondary NIC&#8217;s. If you do this could be the source of your rouge record in DNS. </p>
<p>Also, check all of your IP settings on the Linux box for any old IP&#8217;s that still may be configured. Just because your box is working on the network does not necessarily mean that an old address is not present somewhere. </p>
<p>Good Luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ralfeus</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dns-ptr-records-inexplicable-appearance/#comment-41509</link>
		<dc:creator>ralfeus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:40:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-41509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An owner of that record is SYSTEM. I checked it first of all... Is it possible to log all update requests including username of update initiator and IP address of computer where request was send from?
Thanks
Mykhaylo]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An owner of that record is SYSTEM. I checked it first of all&#8230; Is it possible to log all update requests including username of update initiator and IP address of computer where request was send from?<br />
Thanks<br />
Mykhaylo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonyfreek</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dns-ptr-records-inexplicable-appearance/#comment-41510</link>
		<dc:creator>sonyfreek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-41510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ralfeus,

Your question is who created the record?  If you have your DNS Active Directory integrated, you should be able to look at the properties of the record and see who created it.  I&#039;m not sitting at a DNS server right now to test it, but I believe that there are properties on who is the owner.  You&#039;ll have to fiddle around with it because I don&#039;t remember how to look at who owns it, but it&#039;s not extremely hard to do.

Hope this helps,
SF

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ralfeus,</p>
<p>Your question is who created the record?  If you have your DNS Active Directory integrated, you should be able to look at the properties of the record and see who created it.  I&#8217;m not sitting at a DNS server right now to test it, but I believe that there are properties on who is the owner.  You&#8217;ll have to fiddle around with it because I don&#8217;t remember how to look at who owns it, but it&#8217;s not extremely hard to do.</p>
<p>Hope this helps,<br />
SF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richl01</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dns-ptr-records-inexplicable-appearance/#comment-41511</link>
		<dc:creator>richl01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-41511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[check your secondary DNS server to see if the old PTR is being replicated back. , or any other program trying to gain access through IP, including mapped drives.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>check your secondary DNS server to see if the old PTR is being replicated back. , or any other program trying to gain access through IP, including mapped drives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ctyauhk</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dns-ptr-records-inexplicable-appearance/#comment-41512</link>
		<dc:creator>ctyauhk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-41512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have no solution.  But is there any chance you have forgotten a DHCP server which is still leasing the ip address?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no solution.  But is there any chance you have forgotten a DHCP server which is still leasing the ip address?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ralfeus</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dns-ptr-records-inexplicable-appearance/#comment-41513</link>
		<dc:creator>ralfeus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-41513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All names are in lower case only]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All names are in lower case only</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ralfeus</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dns-ptr-records-inexplicable-appearance/#comment-41514</link>
		<dc:creator>ralfeus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-41514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All names are in lower case only]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All names are in lower case only</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim123</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dns-ptr-records-inexplicable-appearance/#comment-41515</link>
		<dc:creator>tim123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 09:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-41515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We had a problem with DNS records returning if they contain upper case characters. If this is the case you can call microsoft for the fix. This is free]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We had a problem with DNS records returning if they contain upper case characters. If this is the case you can call microsoft for the fix. This is free</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ralfeus</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dns-ptr-records-inexplicable-appearance/#comment-41516</link>
		<dc:creator>ralfeus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 08:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-41516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The host with such IP address existed, but now it has other address. That computer is Linux box. So, there is no host with IP address, which appear in reverse zone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The host with such IP address existed, but now it has other address. That computer is Linux box. So, there is no host with IP address, which appear in reverse zone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.013 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 392/395 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-25 14:11:53 -->