 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Archive Reliability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/digital-archive-reliability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/digital-archive-reliability/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 07:52:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: sunsetrider</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/digital-archive-reliability/#comment-101517</link>
		<dc:creator>sunsetrider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-101517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few years ago, I was involved in a project which converted &#039;reel&#039; tapes to cartridge tapes.  We processed over 1500 units (some of which had not been accessed in 15+ years) and discovered that about 85% were readable.  The &#039;unreadable&#039; data was basically lost.

I would recommend that every 10 years, all archived data should be re-created onto the current media of choice, to ensure readability as well as non-obsolesence.  

Part of the rational for converting the &#039;reel&#039; tapes was that the data was encoded using tape hardware compression/encription, and the manufacturer no longer produced the tape drives. It was very difficut to locate and use these devices.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few years ago, I was involved in a project which converted &#8216;reel&#8217; tapes to cartridge tapes.  We processed over 1500 units (some of which had not been accessed in 15+ years) and discovered that about 85% were readable.  The &#8216;unreadable&#8217; data was basically lost.</p>
<p>I would recommend that every 10 years, all archived data should be re-created onto the current media of choice, to ensure readability as well as non-obsolesence.  </p>
<p>Part of the rational for converting the &#8216;reel&#8217; tapes was that the data was encoded using tape hardware compression/encription, and the manufacturer no longer produced the tape drives. It was very difficut to locate and use these devices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.015 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 268/271 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-18 09:50:25 -->