 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DHCP Server</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dhcp-server-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dhcp-server-3/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 23:02:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: orangehat</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dhcp-server-3/#comment-111921</link>
		<dc:creator>orangehat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 13:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dhcp-server-3/#comment-111921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds like a home work question.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a home work question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ekardris</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dhcp-server-3/#comment-111859</link>
		<dc:creator>ekardris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 15:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dhcp-server-3/#comment-111859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think everyone here is on the same page with DHCP.&#160; When you mention 300 clients recieving DHCP, I assume you mean some type of user workstation?I&#039;m curious how you are setting up your printers, servers and static devices.&#160; I&#039;m also curious if your DHCP is letting go of IP addresses.&#160; There is always a redflag when someone says 300 of anything when talking about a standard subnet.You didn&#039;t mention that you have multiple DHCP segments or a non-standard scope (i.e. more than 254 IP addresses per segment)&#160; I am wondering if your environment is highly mobile and you&#039;ve never had more than 200 users on the network at a time?&#160; Is the lease&#160;on your IP numbers very short?&#160; Normally I would have multiple scopes setup.&#160; I wonder if you have a backup DHCP server that is backing up the original and it&#039;s been taking part of the load and it has failed?&#160; There are so many things it could be, it&#039;s difficult to answer the question without more details on the environment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think everyone here is on the same page with DHCP.&nbsp; When you mention 300 clients recieving DHCP, I assume you mean some type of user workstation?I&#8217;m curious how you are setting up your printers, servers and static devices.&nbsp; I&#8217;m also curious if your DHCP is letting go of IP addresses.&nbsp; There is always a redflag when someone says 300 of anything when talking about a standard subnet.You didn&#8217;t mention that you have multiple DHCP segments or a non-standard scope (i.e. more than 254 IP addresses per segment)&nbsp; I am wondering if your environment is highly mobile and you&#8217;ve never had more than 200 users on the network at a time?&nbsp; Is the lease&nbsp;on your IP numbers very short?&nbsp; Normally I would have multiple scopes setup.&nbsp; I wonder if you have a backup DHCP server that is backing up the original and it&#8217;s been taking part of the load and it has failed?&nbsp; There are so many things it could be, it&#8217;s difficult to answer the question without more details on the environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jinteik</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dhcp-server-3/#comment-111794</link>
		<dc:creator>jinteik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 14:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dhcp-server-3/#comment-111794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and what is the scope allocated for your machines? if lets say you set 300 u got 320, then 20 pc wont get ip]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and what is the scope allocated for your machines? if lets say you set 300 u got 320, then 20 pc wont get ip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe9527</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dhcp-server-3/#comment-111791</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe9527</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 12:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dhcp-server-3/#comment-111791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are the new machines in a seperate segment? Is there firewalls in the way?Are the NIC card properties set to used DHCP?Is there enough IP addresses in the scope?Are these machines trying to use a 169.x.x.x? this means the NIC card has tried and assigned itself an IP address?As Tom has said more info please]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the new machines in a seperate segment? Is there firewalls in the way?Are the NIC card properties set to used DHCP?Is there enough IP addresses in the scope?Are these machines trying to use a 169.x.x.x? this means the NIC card has tried and assigned itself an IP address?As Tom has said more info please</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TomLiotta</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dhcp-server-3/#comment-111784</link>
		<dc:creator>TomLiotta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 11:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/dhcp-server-3/#comment-111784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;EM&gt;what is the reason?&lt;/EM&gt;
&#160;
Without an error message or event identifier of some kind, we can&#039;t know why it&#039;s not working. One reasonable possibility is that the DHCP server was configured to supply a range of addresses, and the range is now filled. You&#039;ll need to update your DHCP server to cover a larger range if that is the problem.
&#160;
If it&#039;s not the problem, then more information is needed.
&#160;
Tom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>what is the reason?</em><br />
&nbsp;<br />
Without an error message or event identifier of some kind, we can&#8217;t know why it&#8217;s not working. One reasonable possibility is that the DHCP server was configured to supply a range of addresses, and the range is now filled. You&#8217;ll need to update your DHCP server to cover a larger range if that is the problem.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
If it&#8217;s not the problem, then more information is needed.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 3/10 queries in 0.034 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 323/329 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-26 00:28:24 -->