DFS real time replication in roaming profiles and home directories

25 pts.
Tags:
DFS
DFS Replication
Failover
RAID 5
Roaming Profiles
Windows Server 2008
Sorry for a possible repost. Is it ok to use two Win2008 servers (dual core Xeon with SAS disks in RAID 5) to set up a DFS target with real time replication for roaming profiles and users' home directories so if one of the servers fails, the users will still be able to access their data? The replicated user area will be about 200GB in size and may be accessed by ~120 users concurrently. Thank you. Luís Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro www.puc-rio.br
ASKED: July 29, 2008  7:34 PM
UPDATED: August 12, 2008  4:37 PM

Answer Wiki

Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.

Luis,

I think that this should work fine. I use DFS to replicate files a lot but I have not tried profiles. You should make sure that you have good bandwidth between the two servers so as to not bottleneck the replication or your network, (possible to have own link between each other?). Stating that, I have found this info from plumley on tech republic. His mentions DFS on win2k3 but it should work even better on win2k8 with the new DFRS:

DFS – Roaming Profiles – Known Limits
Starting with the optimum of Windows 2k3 R2, it is really easy and reliable.
1 – Permissions versus Ownership
Roaming Profiles require two things to work and you can set those in Active Directory or Group Policy. To administer the profiles you must take ownership, if you don’t the user owns the directory and you cannot control content or quotas. The user requires modify rights to their directory, not full rights.
2 – Local settings and My Documents
To manage the size of profiles you must separate My Documents by changing the properties. Also set IE to delete Temp files on exit and minimize History. Regular cleanup of ‘cookies’ is highly recommended.
3 – Load times
We have 60 users locally and 10 more in a town 75 miles away. The local users can tolerate profiles up to 80-100 MB. Even with a OC3 line connecting the sites, the remote users find logins painfully slow at 50-60 MB.
(That is why we have a remote server and replicate the profiles.)
4 – DFSR: standards and conventions
Read the MS white papers, then test and test again. Filenames kept to less than 31 characters. Avoid periods and commas in names. The only ‘dot’ (period) sholuld be before the extension and the extension should be normal (.txt or .doc). Path lengths no more than 255 (including filename and extension). Folder depth no more than 8 levels. All of these are standard MS recommendations, not being compliant may not break your system. BUT it makes finding problems much harder.
6 – Older versions of Windows Server have other limitations. I had tried Roaming Profiles in 2000, but had real success when we moved to 2k3.

Discuss This Question: 2  Replies

 
There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.
Thanks. We'll let you know when a new response is added.
Send me notifications when members answer or reply to this question.

REGISTER or login:

Forgot Password?
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy
  • lfpuc
    Buddyfarr Yes, I have plans to have a 1Gb/s RJ45 point to point cable connecting the 2 servers, although I don't know yet how to force the replication service to use this link (like DRBD in Unix-like systems). About the "My documents" folder: even if I move this folder away from the user's profile, this folder will have to be in the user's home directory, which I want to be replicated. Well THAT'S what I am looking for. So I will have to do a lot of simulations... And what about anti-virus resident protection and regular scans? Should I enable it in only one of the servers to avoid simultaneous actions with the two instances of the same file? Thanks
    25 pointsBadges:
    report
  • lfpuc
    Buddyfarr I read some of the posts in the threads associated to the one from plumley you pointed out on Tech Republic. There is one that I remember to have read in the past, when I unsuccessfuly tried to use DFS with home directories in Win2003 R1: BFilmFan wrote (in 2004): Microsoft doesn't recommend mapping home folders via DFS. Although the article isn't on their site anymore, you can see a copy here on JSI's site: http://www.jsiinc.com/SUBI/tip4000/rh4091.htm Well, now not even jsiinc exists. Let's hope this issue no longer exists either...
    25 pointsBadges:
    report

Forgot Password

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an e-mail containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

To follow this tag...

There was an error processing your information. Please try again later.

REGISTER or login:

Forgot Password?
By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Thanks! We'll email you when relevant content is added and updated.

Following