<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Database migration from SQL Server 2000 to SQL Server 2005</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/database-migration-from-sql-server-2000-to-sql-server-2005/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/database-migration-from-sql-server-2000-to-sql-server-2005/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ritchie1</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/database-migration-from-sql-server-2000-to-sql-server-2005/#comment-54398</link>
		<dc:creator>Ritchie1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 08:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-54398</guid>
		<description>It is possible to upgrade without taking the database offline using the detach attach method. You can use the in-place upgrade where the disconnection time is minmal. But it does have it's disadvantages. The detach \ attach is quickest method for whole transfer, but the off-line period is longer than the in-place method. These links might be helpful:

http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/ssamuel/2987.asp 
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/sqlupgrd.mspx
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=3d5e96d9-0074-46c4-bd4f-c3eb2abf4b66&#38;DisplayLang=en</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is possible to upgrade without taking the database offline using the detach attach method. You can use the in-place upgrade where the disconnection time is minmal. But it does have it&#8217;s disadvantages. The detach \ attach is quickest method for whole transfer, but the off-line period is longer than the in-place method. These links might be helpful:</p>
<p>&nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/ssamuel/2987.asp" title="http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/ssamuel/2987.asp" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnis&#8230;&lt;/a&gt;<br />
&nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/sqlupgrd.mspx" title="http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/sqlupgrd.mspx" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtec&#8230;&lt;/a&gt;<br />
&nbsp;&lt;a href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=3d5e96d9-0074-46c4-bd4f-c3eb2abf4b66&amp;DisplayLang=en" title="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=3d5e96d9-0074-46c4-bd4f-c3eb2abf4b66&amp;DisplayLang=en" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/detai&#8230;&lt;/a&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrdenny</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/database-migration-from-sql-server-2000-to-sql-server-2005/#comment-54154</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrdenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-54154</guid>
		<description>Check out my SQL Server blog "[A href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/"]SQL Server with Mr Denny[/A]" for more SQL Server information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out my SQL Server blog &#8220;<a href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/sql-server/">SQL Server with Mr Denny</a>&#8221; for more SQL Server information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->