 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Database Design Help</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/database-design-help/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/database-design-help/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:05:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: jessromanowski</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/database-design-help/#comment-78019</link>
		<dc:creator>jessromanowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 21:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-78019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks guys...   
Carlosdl: Yes, the assumption is that any lawyer can represent any organization.  

CharlieBrowne:  I am not sure why I would need the start and end dates in the Deal_Organization table, should the start and end date fields be identified there rather than in the Deals table?  

Again.. Thank you thank you thank you!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks guys&#8230;<br />
Carlosdl: Yes, the assumption is that any lawyer can represent any organization.  </p>
<p>CharlieBrowne:  I am not sure why I would need the start and end dates in the Deal_Organization table, should the start and end date fields be identified there rather than in the Deals table?  </p>
<p>Again.. Thank you thank you thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charliebrowne</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/database-design-help/#comment-78017</link>
		<dc:creator>charliebrowne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 20:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-78017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adding on to what Carlos has stated,I would add a start and end date in the Deals_Organizatrion file.It appears you also need to identify both organizations involved in the deal. 
Here is what your file could look like wiith multiple entries.
&lt;pre&gt;
1st Org         2nd Org  DealID	Lawyer ID	Start Date	End Date
100	101	1	25	4/1/2010	
100	102	1	25	4/1/2010	5/15/2010
100	102	1	26	5/15/2010	
100	150	2	26	4/18/2010	
101	102	3	31	6/2/2010	
105	107	4	19	5/12/2010	5/14/2010
105	107	4	22	5/15/2010&lt;/pre&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adding on to what Carlos has stated,I would add a start and end date in the Deals_Organizatrion file.It appears you also need to identify both organizations involved in the deal.<br />
Here is what your file could look like wiith multiple entries.</p>
<pre>
1st Org         2nd Org  DealID	Lawyer ID	Start Date	End Date
100	101	1	25	4/1/2010	
100	102	1	25	4/1/2010	5/15/2010
100	102	1	26	5/15/2010	
100	150	2	26	4/18/2010	
101	102	3	31	6/2/2010	
105	107	4	19	5/12/2010	5/14/2010
105	107	4	22	5/15/2010</pre>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlosdl</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/database-design-help/#comment-77998</link>
		<dc:creator>carlosdl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-77998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think you need a &#039;CurrentDealsID&#039; (in fact I would use a different name for that table, something like &#039;Deals_Organizations&#039;.

So, the Deals_Organizations table would have at least:

&lt;pre&gt;DealID
OrganizationID
LawyerID&lt;/pre&gt;

If you have a deal in which 3 organizations are involved, you would have 3 records in this table for that deal.

&lt;pre&gt;DealID	OrganizationID	LawyerID
&lt;b&gt;1&lt;/b&gt;	100		25
&lt;b&gt;1&lt;/b&gt;	101		26
&lt;b&gt;1&lt;/b&gt;	102		27	&lt;/pre&gt;

Additional comment:  Your design permits that any lawyer can represent any organization.  Is that correct ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you need a &#8216;CurrentDealsID&#8217; (in fact I would use a different name for that table, something like &#8216;Deals_Organizations&#8217;.</p>
<p>So, the Deals_Organizations table would have at least:</p>
<pre>DealID
OrganizationID
LawyerID</pre>
<p>If you have a deal in which 3 organizations are involved, you would have 3 records in this table for that deal.</p>
<pre>DealID	OrganizationID	LawyerID
<b>1</b>	100		25
<b>1</b>	101		26
<b>1</b>	102		27	</pre>
<p>Additional comment:  Your design permits that any lawyer can represent any organization.  Is that correct ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jessromanowski</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/database-design-help/#comment-77993</link>
		<dc:creator>jessromanowski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 15:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-77993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ok so I&#039;ve updated my tables:

Tables:

Lawyers
LawyerID
LawyerFName
LawyerLName
LawyerStreet
LawyerCity
LawyerState
LawyerZip
Specialization
Fee

Organizations
OrganizationID
OrgName
OrgStreet
OrgCity
OrgState
OrgZip

Deals
DealID
DealDescription
BeginDate
EndDate

CurrentDeals
CurrentDealsID
DealID
OrganizationID
LawyerID

BUT... I am still confused how I implement this properly since one of the assumed conditions is that each individual deal could consist of MANY organizations... More confused than ever :( Thanks everyone for helping!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok so I&#8217;ve updated my tables:</p>
<p>Tables:</p>
<p>Lawyers<br />
LawyerID<br />
LawyerFName<br />
LawyerLName<br />
LawyerStreet<br />
LawyerCity<br />
LawyerState<br />
LawyerZip<br />
Specialization<br />
Fee</p>
<p>Organizations<br />
OrganizationID<br />
OrgName<br />
OrgStreet<br />
OrgCity<br />
OrgState<br />
OrgZip</p>
<p>Deals<br />
DealID<br />
DealDescription<br />
BeginDate<br />
EndDate</p>
<p>CurrentDeals<br />
CurrentDealsID<br />
DealID<br />
OrganizationID<br />
LawyerID</p>
<p>BUT&#8230; I am still confused how I implement this properly since one of the assumed conditions is that each individual deal could consist of MANY organizations&#8230; More confused than ever <img src='http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' />  Thanks everyone for helping!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/9 queries in 0.015 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 314/317 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-22 05:29:22 -->