http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/cpf3204/ Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:29:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/cpf3204/#comment-114999 aceofdelts Tue, 08 Jan 2013 16:56:44 +0000 http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/cpf3204/#comment-114999 Removing the triggers on the physical file did the trick.
thanks for the quick replies.

]]> http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/cpf3204/#comment-114110 philpl1jb Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:32:59 +0000 http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/cpf3204/#comment-114110 I suspect that the compile jobs library list didn’t include the library with this file or the logical file had the wrong library or file name in the PFILE.

]]> http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/cpf3204/#comment-114108 TomLiotta Fri, 07 Dec 2012 21:26:24 +0000 http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/cpf3204/#comment-114108 Is that the only message? The joblog and the compile listing might both have messages. If you run STRDBG and STRSQL, can you run CREATE VIEW to see if a similar SQL VIEW can be created? The debug output might show more detail. Are there any constraints on the PF? — Tom

]]>