 




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Converting and deploying 6i Forms to Forms 10g</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/converting-and-deploying-6i-forms-to-forms-10g/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/converting-and-deploying-6i-forms-to-forms-10g/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:24:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: oracledevloper</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/converting-and-deploying-6i-forms-to-forms-10g/#comment-89820</link>
		<dc:creator>oracledevloper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 05:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-89820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oracle-10g Database is not connected by Oracle developer 6i]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oracle-10g Database is not connected by Oracle developer 6i</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herbiebill</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/converting-and-deploying-6i-forms-to-forms-10g/#comment-63720</link>
		<dc:creator>herbiebill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 18:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-63720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you Carlos!  I don&#039;t know why it made a difference, but my versions were off.  I must have installed Developer 10g version 1.  When I uninstalled version 1 and installed version 2 I was able to compile the form.

I don&#039;t know if I was really connecting to the DB or not, but if you hadn&#039;t challenged me to look harder, I would never have noticed the dichotomy between the two SQLPlus versions I was using.

Thanks again,
-Bill Pearson]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Carlos!  I don&#8217;t know why it made a difference, but my versions were off.  I must have installed Developer 10g version 1.  When I uninstalled version 1 and installed version 2 I was able to compile the form.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if I was really connecting to the DB or not, but if you hadn&#8217;t challenged me to look harder, I would never have noticed the dichotomy between the two SQLPlus versions I was using.</p>
<p>Thanks again,<br />
-Bill Pearson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carlosdl</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/converting-and-deploying-6i-forms-to-forms-10g/#comment-63651</link>
		<dc:creator>carlosdl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 15:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-63651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think it should work.  I have succesfully compiled a 10g form against an 8i database, so I guess it should also work with 9i.

Also, if the user is the owner of the tables, no synonyms are needed, you are right.

When you connect from SQL*Plus, are you sure you are using the executable from the Developer 10g installation ?  If you have the database client software installed, you could be using that version.

Are you completely sure that forms builder is connected to the database ? (sorry, I had to ask)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it should work.  I have succesfully compiled a 10g form against an 8i database, so I guess it should also work with 9i.</p>
<p>Also, if the user is the owner of the tables, no synonyms are needed, you are right.</p>
<p>When you connect from SQL*Plus, are you sure you are using the executable from the Developer 10g installation ?  If you have the database client software installed, you could be using that version.</p>
<p>Are you completely sure that forms builder is connected to the database ? (sorry, I had to ask)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: herbiebill</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/converting-and-deploying-6i-forms-to-forms-10g/#comment-63605</link>
		<dc:creator>herbiebill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 21:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-63605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for info and the documentation reference!  When I try to compile the 6i applications in 10g, I get an error message for each table saying that they must be declared.  Any ideas why?

The tables are in a 9i database and reside in the same schema name that I&#039;m using to connect Developer 10g to the database.  Since the tables are owned by the user ID I&#039;m logging in with, they shouldn&#039;t require synonyms or owner/instance references.  When I log into SQLPlus using the same credentials, I have no problem seeing the tables.

I&#039;m beginning to wonder if I can use Developer 10g in a 9i database.  Any advice would be appreciated.

-Bill Pearson]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for info and the documentation reference!  When I try to compile the 6i applications in 10g, I get an error message for each table saying that they must be declared.  Any ideas why?</p>
<p>The tables are in a 9i database and reside in the same schema name that I&#8217;m using to connect Developer 10g to the database.  Since the tables are owned by the user ID I&#8217;m logging in with, they shouldn&#8217;t require synonyms or owner/instance references.  When I log into SQLPlus using the same credentials, I have no problem seeing the tables.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m beginning to wonder if I can use Developer 10g in a 9i database.  Any advice would be appreciated.</p>
<p>-Bill Pearson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 6/8 queries in 0.013 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 311/312 objects using memcached

Served from: itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com @ 2013-05-25 02:25:54 -->