<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Convert column from Number(9) to varchar2(3) in SQL</title>
	<atom:link href="http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/convert-column-from-number9-to-varhcar23/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/convert-column-from-number9-to-varhcar23/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 21:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carlosdl</title>
		<link>http://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/itanswers/convert-column-from-number9-to-varhcar23/#comment-65032</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlosdl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-65032</guid>
		<description>I agree with  Kccrosser.  That could be your better option, but keep in mind that when using this approach, you are  temporary storing the complete contents of the table in memory.

Depending on the available resources on the server, and the amount of data in the table, you might want to perform the bulk fetch / insert in chunks, using the LIMIT clause.

Let us know if you need further help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with  Kccrosser.  That could be your better option, but keep in mind that when using this approach, you are  temporary storing the complete contents of the table in memory.</p>
<p>Depending on the available resources on the server, and the amount of data in the table, you might want to perform the bulk fetch / insert in chunks, using the LIMIT clause.</p>
<p>Let us know if you need further help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- dynamic -->